Ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimens in patients with atherosclerotic artery disease-A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

被引:4
|
作者
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Ndrepepa, Gjin [1 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [2 ,3 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,2 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Alfonso, Fernando [4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, Lazarettstr 36, Munich, Germany
[2] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, 1 Med Klin, Munich, Germany
[4] Hosp Univ La Princesa Madrid, Cardiac Dept, Madrid, Spain
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; THERAPY; CLOPIDOGREL; ASPIRIN; INHIBITION; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Randomized trials did not consistently support superiority of ticagrelor, as monotherapy or in combination with aspirin, in terms of efficacy or safety, in patients with atherosclerotic artery disease. Methods Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and scientific session abstracts were searched for trials of patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (with >1,000 participants and a follow-up >= 3 months) randomly assigned to ticagrelor-based or conventional antiplatelet therapies. Trial-level hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a fixed- or random-effect model (in case of significant heterogeneity) with the inverse variance weighting. The primary outcome was alkause mortality. Other outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding. Results Overall 77,489 patients received either ticagrelor-based (n = 38,721) or conventional antiplatelet regimens (n = 38,768) in 6 trials. The primary outcome occurred in 4.5% of patients treated with experimental therapy and 4.9% of patients treated with control therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.01; P = .07). Overall, patients treated with ticagrelor-based versus conventional antiplatelet regimens showed no significant difference in terms of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding after 20 months. However, in trials of patients with coronary artery disease as primary diagnosis, the risk for all-cause death (HR = 0.84 [0.77-0.91], P < .001) and MI (HR = 0.87 [0.80-0.94], P = .007) was significantly reduced by experimental therapy. Conclusions In patients with atherosclerotic artery disease, the benefit of ticagrelor-based therapies was confined to patients treated for coronary artery disease. The drug significantly reduced the risk for all-cause death and MI without excess risk of bleeding in these patients. In consideration of limitations of subgroup analyses, these results need further validation.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimens in patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    von Scheidt, Moritz
    Bongiovanni, Dario
    Tebbe, Ulrich
    Nowak, Bernd
    Stritzke, Jan
    Zhao, Qiang
    Zhu, Yunpeng
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Schunkert, Heribert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 57 (03) : 520 - 528
  • [2] Ticagrelor as compared to conventional antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials
    Verdoia, Monica
    Savonitto, Stefano
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Kedhi, Elvin
    De Luca, Giuseppe
    VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 137
  • [3] Stroke of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shao, Qiao Yu
    Wang, Zhi Jian
    Ma, Xiao Teng
    Lin, Xu Ze
    Pan, Liu
    Zhou, Yu Jie
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Antiplatelet Agents Versus Placebo/Control for Treating Peripheral Artery Disease
    Qian, Jun
    Yang, Xiao Hong
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (31)
  • [5] Ticagrelor for the primary prevention of stroke in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kong, Qi
    Ma, Xin
    Zhao, Xiaoxi
    Chen, Fei
    Hou, Chengbei
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2020, 50 (04) : 942 - 956
  • [6] Dual vs Single Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Navarese, Eliano
    Bliden, Kevin
    Tantry, Udaya
    Gurbel, Paul A.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [7] Ticagrelor for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiang, Feng
    Lin, Yifeng
    Chen, Binwu
    PERFUSION-UK, 2023, 38 (04): : 698 - 705
  • [8] Stroke of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qiao Yu Shao
    Zhi Jian Wang
    Xiao Teng Ma
    Xu Ze Lin
    Liu Pan
    Yu Jie Zhou
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 21
  • [9] Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy for Cervical Artery Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Ye, Sheng-Lin
    Wang, Chuang
    Wang, Lu-Lu
    Xu, Tian-Ze
    Li, Xiao-Qiang
    Tang, Tao
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2021, 27
  • [10] Antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Benz, Alexander P.
    Johansson, Isabelle
    Dewilde, Willem J. M.
    Lopes, Renato D.
    Mehran, Roxana
    Sartori, Samantha
    Sarafoff, Nikolaus
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    McIntyre, William F.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    Shoamanesh, Ashkan
    Eikelboom, John W.
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2021, : 648 - 659