An extended stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria prioritization process

被引:111
作者
Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani [1 ]
Yazdani, Morteza [2 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [3 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Management Sci & Technol, Technol Foresight Grp, Tehran Polytech, POB 1585-4413, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Europea Madrid, Dept Business Management, Fac Social Sci, Madrid 28670, Spain
[3] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Res Inst Smart Bldg Technol, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Multiple attributes decision making (MADM); Stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA); Extended SWARA; Prioritizing the criteria; Weighting criteria; DECISION-MAKING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; SELECTION; PRIORITY; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; RANKING; WASPAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-018-3092-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The process of criteria prioritization and weighting is an important part of multiple attributes decision making. The most frequently applied multi-attribute decision-making weighting tools include analytical hierarchy process, stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis, factor relationship, and best-worst method. When policies are at the core of decision making, stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis method is the most efficient method for criteria evaluation. It involves two important steps: the first is to prioritize the criteria by consulting experts, while the second is the weighting process. This research seeks to extend stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis to improve the quality of the decision-making process by incorporating the reliability evaluation of experts' idea into the first step. Such a component is absent from the first step in all other similar models. Thus, an extended version of stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis can be applied for such evaluation. To test the applicability and performance of the proposed method, a numerical example from an earlier study was used. The proposed version can replace the classic version in future studies as an improved method in decision-making area.
引用
收藏
页码:7399 / 7405
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach [J].
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz ;
Bahrami, Mohsen .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2014, 20 (03) :534-553
[12]   New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System [J].
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz ;
Saparauskas, Jonas .
INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2013, 24 (05) :408-414
[13]  
Hashemkhani Zolfani S, 2013, E M EKON MANAG, V16, P161
[14]   Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating [J].
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz ;
Aghdaie, Mohammad Hasan ;
Derakhti, Arman ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Varzandeh, Mohammad Hossein Morshed .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (17) :7111-7121
[15]   IMP: A decision aid for multiattribute evaluation using imprecise weight estimates [J].
Jessop, Alan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 49 :18-29
[16]   RANKING OF COMPANIES ACCORDING TO THE INDICATORS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BASED ON SWARA AND ARAS METHODS [J].
Karabasevic, Darjan ;
Paunkovic, Jane ;
Stanujkic, Dragisa .
SERBIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) :43-53
[17]   The Framework for the Selection of Personnel Based on the SWARA and ARAS Methods Under Uncertainties [J].
Karabasevic, Darjan ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Turskis, Zenonas ;
Stanujkic, Dragisa .
INFORMATICA, 2016, 27 (01) :49-65
[18]  
Karabasevic D, 2015, ACTA MONTAN SLOVACA, V20, P116
[19]  
Kendall MG, 1970, RANK CORRELATION MET
[20]   SELECTION OF RATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHOD BY APPLYING NEW STEP-WISE WEIGHT ASSESSMENT RATIO ANALYSIS (SWARA) [J].
Kersuliene, Violeta ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 11 (02) :243-258