Parallel hierarchical solvers and preconditioners for boundary element methods

被引:27
|
作者
Grama, A [1 ]
Kumar, V
Sameh, A
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Comp Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING | 1998年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
hierarchical dense matrix-vector product; parallel treecode; Barnes-Hut method; fast multipole method; boundary element method; dense iterative solver; preconditioning boundary element methods;
D O I
10.1137/S1064827596313322
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The method of moments is an important tool for solving boundary integral equations arising in a variety of applications. It transforms the physical problem into a dense linear system. Due to the large number of variables and the associated computational requirements, these systems are solved iteratively using methods such as GMRES and CG and its variants. The core operation of these iterative solvers is the application of the system matrix to a vector. This requires theta(n(2)) operations and memory using accurate dense methods. The computational complexity can be reduced to O(n log n) and the memory requirement to Theta(n) using hierarchical approximation techniques. The algorithmic speedup from approximation can be combined with parallelism to yield very fast dense solvers. In this paper, we present efficient parallel formulations of dense iterative solvers based on hierarchical approximations for solving potential integral equations of the first kind. We study the impact of various parameters on the accuracy and performance of the parallel solver. We demonstrate that our parallel formulation incurs minimal parallel processing overhead and scales up to a large number of processors. We present two preconditioning techniques for accelerating the convergence of the iterative solver. These techniques are based on an inner-outer scheme and a block-diagonal scheme based on a truncated Green's function. We present detailed experimental results on up to 256 processors of a Cray T3D. Our code achieves raw computational speeds of over 5 GFLOPS. When compared to the accurate solver, this corresponds to a speed of approximately 776 GFLOPS.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 358
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the preconditioners for fast multipole boundary element methods for 2D multi-domain elastostatics
    Wang, HT
    Yao, ZH
    Wang, PB
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2005, 29 (07) : 673 - 688
  • [42] OpenMp solvers for parallel finite element and meshless analyses
    Ju, S. H.
    ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2014, 31 (01) : 2 - 17
  • [43] SCALABLE LOW-ORDER FINITE ELEMENT PRECONDITIONERS FOR HIGH-ORDER SPECTRAL ELEMENT POISSON SOLVERS
    Bello-Maldonado, Pedro D.
    Fischer, Paul F.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2019, 41 (05): : S2 - S18
  • [44] Preconditioners for spectral element methods for elliptic and parabolic problems
    Dutt, P.
    Biswas, P.
    Raju, G. Naga
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2008, 215 (01) : 152 - 166
  • [46] Preconditioners with projectors for mixed hybrid finite element methods
    Kuznetsov, Yuri A.
    Kramarenko, Vasily K.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2017, 32 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [47] Auxiliary Space Preconditioners for Mixed Finite Element Methods
    Tuminaro, Ray S.
    Xu, Jinchao
    Zhu, Yunrong
    DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING XVIII, 2009, 70 : 99 - 109
  • [48] Parallel hierarchical hybrid linear solvers for emerging computing platforms
    Agullo, Emmanuel
    Giraud, Luc
    Guermouche, Abdou
    Roman, Jean
    COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2011, 339 (2-3): : 96 - 103
  • [49] Parallel preconditioners and multigrid solvers for stochastic polynomial chaos discretizations of the diffusion equation at the large scale
    Lee, Barry
    NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 23 (01) : 5 - 36
  • [50] Robust Boundary Element Domain Decomposition Solvers in Acoustics
    Steinbach, Olaf
    Windisch, Markus
    DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING XIX, 2011, 78 : 277 - 284