Health policy in relation to improving equity in child health

被引:0
作者
Gordon, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Townsend Ctr Int Poverty Res, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
health care in the United States and the United Kingdom; health systems in the United States and the United Kingdom; child health inequality; poverty and child health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
A major independent inquiry into inequalities in health-and policies that would reduce them-was published in December 1998.(1) It identified >40 recommendations designed to reduce inequalities in health. Lifting children out of poverty is among the most important strategies to improve child health. If we want to change policies on health and poverty, then we have to consider the broad political context within which our health systems work. In the United Kingdom, we have a welfare state that sends checks and cash income to 85% of households every month. Many people pay into the welfare state, many people get money back, and everybody receives services.(2) In the United States, the situation is different. There, many people pay into the state, but only the poor and corporations actually receive a check. I leave you to decide who gets the most out of these respective systems. We also have fundamental differences in our health systems. In the United Kingdom, 97% of expenditures on health are made by the state; there is virtually no private spending. In the United States, only 44% of health expenditures are made by the state. The limited amount of private health expenditures in the United Kingdom will be reduced further as the National Health Service provides more dentistry in the future. In terms of the amount of resources, the United States spends 14% of its gross domestic product on health, compared with 6% in the United Kingdom. The United States spent $3700 per person on health care in 1997. In the United Kingdom, we spent less than one third of that.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 726
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Acheson D., 1998, Independent inquiry into inequalities in health: report
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, TACKLING INEQUALITIE
  • [4] Bradshaw J., 2001, POVERTY OUTCOMES CHI
  • [5] Gordon D., 2000, POVERTY SOCIAL EXCLU
  • [6] Gordon D., 1999, INEQUALITIES HLTH EV
  • [7] MARLIER E, 2000, STAT FOCUS, V3, P1
  • [8] SHAW M, 1999, WIDENING GAP HLTH IN
  • [9] Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial .2. Black men
    Smith, GD
    Wentworth, D
    Neaton, JD
    Stamler, R
    Stamler, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (04) : 497 - 504
  • [10] Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial .1. White men
    Smith, GD
    Neaton, JD
    Wentworth, D
    Stamler, R
    Stamler, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (04) : 486 - 496