Cystic fibrosis: selecting the prenatal screening strategy of choice

被引:16
|
作者
Wald, NJ
Morris, JK
Rodeck, CH
Haddow, JE
Palomaki, GE
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Dept Environm & Prevent Med, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] UCL, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
[3] Fdn Blood Res, Scarborough, ME 04074 USA
关键词
cystic fibrosis; prenatal screening; couple screening;
D O I
10.1002/pd.618
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Cystic fibrosis is a serious disorder. Research into the treatment of affected individuals is in progress, but a cure is not expected in the near future. In this review, we demonstrate that prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis meets the requirements for a worthwhile screening programme. We explain the reasons that have led us to conclude that one approach ('couple screening') is the method of choice. The couple-based approach calls for reporting results to the couple as a unit. Only if both parents are found to be carriers is the result designated screen-positive and an amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling offered. This offers a substantial reduction in the proportion of women with unaffected pregnancies with positive results (the false-positive rate) compared with other methods without reducing the detection of affected pregnancies. It also avoids creating a screen-positive group for which no definitive diagnosis is available. This is a problem with other screening methods. The couple method can achieve a 72% detection rate for a 0.1% false-positive rate. The screening method is simple, non-invasive, reliable, safe and reasonably cost effective. Existing programmes have shown that screening using this method is acceptable to health care professionals and patients. Setting up a national prenatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis is timely and should be implemented using the couple screening method. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 483
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New strategy for the prenatal detection/exclusion of paternal cystic fibrosis mutations in maternal plasma
    Bustamante-Aragones, Ana
    Gallego-Merlo, Jesus
    Trujillo-Tiebas, Maria Jose
    de Alba, Marta Rodriguez
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Cristina
    Glover, Guillermo
    Diego-Alvarez, Dan
    Ayuso, Carmen
    Ramos, Carnien
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2008, 7 (06) : 505 - 510
  • [32] Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
    Sharp, Jack K.
    Rock, Michael J.
    CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 35 (03) : 107 - 115
  • [33] Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis
    Eichler, I
    Stöckler-Ipsiroglu, S
    MONATSSCHRIFT KINDERHEILKUNDE, 2001, 149 (12) : 1311 - +
  • [34] Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
    Wagener, Jeffrey S.
    Zemanick, Edith T.
    Sontag, Marci K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2012, 24 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [35] Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
    Gonska, Tanja
    Ratjen, Felix
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (05) : 619 - 631
  • [36] Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening
    Massie, John
    Delatycki, Martin B.
    PAEDIATRIC RESPIRATORY REVIEWS, 2013, 14 (04) : 270 - 275
  • [37] Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
    Jack K. Sharp
    Michael J. Rock
    Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2008, 35 : 107 - 115
  • [38] Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
    Dungan, Jeffrey S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 37 (01) : 47 - +
  • [39] An Update on Cystic Fibrosis Screening
    Goetzinger, Katherine R.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 30 (03) : 533 - +
  • [40] A Cross-Sectional Study of the Marital Attitudes of Pregnant Women at Risk for Cystic Fibrosis and Psychological Impact of Prenatal Screening
    Popa, Zoran Laurentiu
    Margan, Madalin-Marius
    Petre, Izabella
    Bernad, Elena
    Stelea, Lavinia
    Chiriac, Veronica Daniela
    Craina, Marius
    Ciuca, Ioana Mihaela
    Bina, Anca Mihaela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (14)