Cystic fibrosis: selecting the prenatal screening strategy of choice

被引:16
|
作者
Wald, NJ
Morris, JK
Rodeck, CH
Haddow, JE
Palomaki, GE
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Dept Environm & Prevent Med, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] UCL, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
[3] Fdn Blood Res, Scarborough, ME 04074 USA
关键词
cystic fibrosis; prenatal screening; couple screening;
D O I
10.1002/pd.618
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Cystic fibrosis is a serious disorder. Research into the treatment of affected individuals is in progress, but a cure is not expected in the near future. In this review, we demonstrate that prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis meets the requirements for a worthwhile screening programme. We explain the reasons that have led us to conclude that one approach ('couple screening') is the method of choice. The couple-based approach calls for reporting results to the couple as a unit. Only if both parents are found to be carriers is the result designated screen-positive and an amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling offered. This offers a substantial reduction in the proportion of women with unaffected pregnancies with positive results (the false-positive rate) compared with other methods without reducing the detection of affected pregnancies. It also avoids creating a screen-positive group for which no definitive diagnosis is available. This is a problem with other screening methods. The couple method can achieve a 72% detection rate for a 0.1% false-positive rate. The screening method is simple, non-invasive, reliable, safe and reasonably cost effective. Existing programmes have shown that screening using this method is acceptable to health care professionals and patients. Setting up a national prenatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis is timely and should be implemented using the couple screening method. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 483
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: An updated perspective
    Doherty, RA
    Bradley, LA
    Haddow, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (02) : 268 - 270
  • [2] Prenatal cystic fibrosis screening in Mexican Americans: An economic analysis
    Doyle, NM
    Gardner, MO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 769 - 774
  • [3] Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an economic analysis
    Nielson, R
    Gyrd-Hansen, DT
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (04) : 285 - 299
  • [4] Implementing prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis in routine obstetric practice
    Fries, MH
    Bashford, M
    Nunes, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (02) : 527 - 534
  • [5] Issues in implementing prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: results of a working conference
    Haddow, JE
    Bradley, LA
    Palomaki, GE
    Doherty, RA
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1999, 6 (02) : 60 - 66
  • [6] COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PRENATAL SCREENING FOR CYSTIC-FIBROSIS
    GARBER, AM
    FENERTY, JP
    MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (05) : 473 - 489
  • [7] Cystic Fibrosis: A Look into the Future of Prenatal Screening and Therapy
    Nishida, Kevin
    Smith, Zachary
    Rana, Dane
    Palmer, Jereme
    Gallicano, G. Ian
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART C-EMBRYO TODAY-REVIEWS, 2015, 105 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [8] Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: past, present and future
    Richards, CS
    Grody, WW
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 4 (01) : 49 - 62
  • [9] Couple-based prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis in primary care settings
    Doherty, RA
    Palomaki, GE
    Kloza, EM
    Erickson, JL
    Haddow, JE
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1996, 16 (05) : 397 - 404
  • [10] Bayesian analysis for cystic fibrosis risks in prenatal and carrier screening
    Ogino, S
    Wilson, RB
    Gold, B
    Hawley, P
    Grody, WW
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (05) : 439 - 449