A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 1. Method development

被引:84
作者
Marras, WS [1 ]
Davis, KG [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Biodynam Lab, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
electromyography; spinal loading; anthropometry; strength; low back injury;
D O I
10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00039-0
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Normalization of muscle activity has been commonly used to determine the amount of force exerted by a muscle. The most widely used reference point for normalization is the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). However, MVCs are often subjective, and potentially limited by sensation of pain in injured individuals. The objective of the current study was to develop a normalization technique that predicts an electromyographic (EMG) reference point from sub-maximal exertions. Regression equations predicting maximum exerted trunk moments were developed from anthropometric measurements of 120 subjects. In addition, 20 subjects performed sub-maximal and maximal exertions to determine the necessary characteristic exertions needed for normalization purposes. For most of the trunk muscles. a highly linear relationship was found between EMG muscle activity and trunk moment exerted. This analysis determined that an EMG-moment reference point can be obtained via a set of sub-maximal exertions in combination with a predicted maximal exertion (expected maximum contraction or EMC) based upon anthropometric measurements. This normalization technique overcomes the limitations of the subjective nature for the MVC method providing a viable assessment method of individuals with a low back injury or those unwilling to exert an MVC as well as could be extended to other joints/muscles. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
BALE P, 1994, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V34, P383
[2]   Methods to reduce the variability of EMG power spectrum estimates [J].
Baratta, RV ;
Solomonow, M ;
Zhou, BH ;
Zhu, M .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (05) :279-285
[3]   PROPOSED STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR STATIC MUSCLE STRENGTH TESTING [J].
CALDWELL, LS ;
CHAFFIN, DB ;
DUKESDOB.FN ;
KROEMER, KHE ;
LAUBACH, LL ;
SNOOK, SH ;
WASSERMAN, DE .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1974, 35 (04) :201-206
[4]  
CHAFFIN DB, 1980, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V12, P205
[5]   ELECTRON AND ION COLLISIONS WITH WATER-VAPOR [J].
DOLAN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (01) :4-8
[6]  
Ferrar HT, 1907, NATIONAL ANTARCTIC E, V1, P1
[7]   SYMMETRY OF LUMBAR ROTATION AND LATERAL FLEXION RANGE OF MOTION AND ISOMETRIC STRENGTH IN SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
GOMEZ, TT .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 19 (01) :42-48
[8]   A method for measuring external loads during dynamic lifting exertions [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS ;
Fathallah, FA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (09) :1219-1222
[9]   WORK LOAD AND FATIGUE IN REPETITIVE ARM ELEVATIONS [J].
HAGBERG, M .
ERGONOMICS, 1981, 24 (07) :543-555
[10]   RELATIONSHIPS OF BODY SIZE, SEGMENTAL DIMENSIONS, AND PONDERAL EQUIVALENTS TO MUSCULAR STRENGTH IN HIGH-STRENGTH AND LOW-STRENGTH SUBJECTS [J].
HORTOBAGYI, T ;
KATCH, FI ;
KATCH, VL ;
LACHANCE, PF ;
BEHNKE, AR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 11 (05) :349-356