Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis

被引:124
作者
Papaspyridakos, Panos [1 ]
De Souza, Andre [1 ]
Vazouras, Konstantinos [1 ]
Gholami, Hadi [1 ]
Pagni, Sarah [2 ]
Weber, Hans-Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, 1 Kneeland St, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Serv, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
dental implants; short dental implants; SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; AUGMENTED BONE; CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSENSUS STATEMENTS; EDENTULOUS JAWS; MAXILLA; REHABILITATION; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13289
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting on the long-term survival and failure rates, as well as the complications of short implants (<= 6 mm) versus longer implants (>6 mm) in posterior jaw areas. Materials and Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify studies, specifically RCTs, reporting on short dental implants (<= 6 mm) and their survival and complication rates compared with implants longer than 6 mm. Secondary outcomes analyzed were marginal bone loss and prosthesis survival rates. Results: Ten RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and featured a total of 637 short (<= 6 mm) implants placed in 392 patients, while 653 standard implants (>6 mm) were inserted in 383 patients. The short implant survival rate ranged from 86.7% to 100%, whereas standard implant survival rate ranged from 95% to 100% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years. The risk ratio (RR) for short implant failure compared to standard implants was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.67, 2.50, p=0.45), demonstrating that overall, short implants presented higher risk of failure compared to longer implants. The heterogeneity test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.67), suggesting low between-study heterogeneity. The prosthesis survival rates from the short implant groups ranged from 90% to 100% and from 95% to 100% for longer implant groups, respectively. Conclusion: Short implants (<= 6 mm) were found to have higher variability and lower predictability in survival rates compared to longer implants (> 6 mm) after periods of 1-5 years in function. The mean survival rate was 96% (range: 86.7%-100%) for short implants, and 98% (range 95%-100%) for longer implants. Based on the quantity and quality of the evidence provided by 10 RCTs, short implants with <= 6 mm length should be carefully selected because they may present a greater risk for failure compared to implants longer than 6 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 20
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Outcomes of placing short implants in the posterior mandible: a preliminary randomized controlled trial [J].
Al-Hashedi, A. A. ;
Taiyeb-Ali, T. B. ;
Yunus, N. .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2016, 61 (02) :208-218
[2]   Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
Ferro-Alves, Marcio Luiz ;
Okamoto, Roberta ;
Mendonaca, Marcos Rogerio ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 47 :8-17
[3]  
Atieh MA, 2012, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V27, P1323
[4]  
Bahat O, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P151
[5]   Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up [J].
Bechara, Souheil ;
Kubilius, Ricardas ;
Veronesi, Giovanni ;
Pires, Jefferson T. ;
Shibli, Jamil A. ;
Mangano, Francesco G. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) :1097-1107
[6]  
Cannizzaro G, 2015, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V8, P27
[7]  
Esposito M, 2015, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V8, P257
[8]  
Esposito M, 2014, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V7, P383
[9]   Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla [J].
Esposito, Marco ;
Worthington, Helen V. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (09)
[10]  
Esposito M, 2011, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V4, P21