The physical meaning of Grasselli's morphology parameters and its correlations with several other 2D fracture roughness parameters

被引:7
作者
Chen, Xi [1 ]
Zeng, Yawu [1 ]
Ye, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Hanqing [1 ,5 ]
Tang, Zhicheng [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaobo [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Hubei Prov Key Lab Safety Geotech & Struct Engn, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Engn Res Ctr, Minist Educ Bldg Detect & Reinforcement, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
2D roughness metric; Physical meaning; Weight; Generalized equivalent relationships; PEAK SHEAR-STRENGTH; ROCK JOINTS; COEFFICIENT; CRITERION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104854
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Grasselli's 2D morphology parameter theta*(max)/(C + 1)(2D) has been widely used in rock engineering. However, the physical meaning of theta*(max)/(C + 1)(2D) is not clear, and the calculation is complex and time-consuming. By introducing a density function to characterize the distribution of the inclination, this study found that the physical meaning of theta*(max)/(C + 1)(2D) is the expected value of the inclination facing the shear direction. Based on this finding, this study found that theta*(max)/(C + 1)(2D) can be simplified as a statistical parameter. Besides, several new 2D roughness metrics expressed in discrete form were proposed. These new roughness metrics have clear physical meanings and can be obtained easily. This study found that two kinds of weight can be employed to calculate the average inclination facing the shear direction. Besides, this study found several generalized equivalent relationships among some 2D roughness metrics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] An investigation on the correlation between the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint roughness parameters
    Abolfazli, Milad
    Fahimifar, Ahmad
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 259
  • [2] Proposing Triangulation-Based Measures for Rock Fracture Roughness
    Babanouri, Nima
    Nasab, Saeed Karimi
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2017, 50 (04) : 1055 - 1061
  • [3] Modified 2D roughness parameters for rock joints at two different scales and their correlation with JRC
    Ban, Liren
    Du, Weisheng
    Qi, Chengzhi
    Zhu, Chun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2021, 137
  • [4] Barton N., 1977, Rock Mechanics, V10, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01261801
  • [5] Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness
    Belem, T
    Homand-Etienne, F
    Souley, M
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2000, 33 (04) : 217 - 242
  • [6] [陈曦 Chen Xi], 2019, [岩石力学与工程学报, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering], V38, P133
  • [7] Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for non-Darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures
    Chen, Yi-Feng
    Zhou, Jia-Qing
    Hu, Shao-Hua
    Hu, Ran
    Zhou, Chuang-Bing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 : 993 - 1006
  • [8] PROFILOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FRACTURES
    ELSOUDANI, SM
    [J]. METALLOGRAPHY, 1978, 11 (03): : 247 - 336
  • [9] Investigation of natural rock joint roughness
    Ge, Yunfeng
    Kulatilake, Pinnaduwa H. S. W.
    Tang, Huiming
    Xiong, Chengren
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2014, 55 : 290 - 305