Assessment and mapping of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: Current status and challenges

被引:194
作者
Machiwal, Deepesh [1 ]
Jha, Madan Kumar [2 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [3 ]
Mohan, Chinchu [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Cent Arid Zone Res Inst, Reg Res Stn, Bhuj 370105, Gujarat, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, AgFE Dept, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, 321 Scoates Hall,2117 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Aquifer vulnerability mapping; Vulnerability assessment methods; Protection zoning; Intrinsic vulnerability; Specific vulnerability; Resource and source protection; Source-Pathway-Receptor approach; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; WELLHEAD PROTECTION ZONES; FUNNELED FLOW MECHANISMS; REGIONAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; MODIFIED-DRASTIC MODEL; AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE; AQUIFER VULNERABILITY; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; KARST-GROUNDWATER; PESTICIDE CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.009
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Increasing groundwater contamination across the globe triggered the concept of "aquifer vulnerability", which has been extensively used worldwide during past three to four decades by researchers and policy makers for protecting groundwater from pollution. However, only a few recent studies have focused on the performance evaluation of two or more vulnerability assessment methods. Some of these studies have resulted in contrasting findings. Given this fact and considering growing threat of groundwater contamination due to increasing human activities across the globe, it is necessary to critically review existing methods, understand current research trends, and identify major challenges associated with the assessment of aquifer vulnerability. Hence, the aim of this study is to present a comprehensive review of the methods and approaches used for the evaluation of aquifer vulnerability for 'resource' and 'source' protection. First, the concept and types of aquifer vulnerability along with the definitions evolved over the years are presented, and then the methods for assessing aquifer vulnerability are suitably classified and briefly discussed. Second, the concept of vulnerability assessment for 'source' protection is highlighted, and the evolution of groundwater vulnerability evaluation methods is presented with an enlightening block diagram. Third, current research trends and critiques on past studies are discussed. Fourth, the major challenges of vulnerability assessment are highlighted and a way forward is suggested. It is concluded that the progress of vulnerability evaluation methods has not kept pace with the advancement of knowledge and tools/techniques. There is an urgent need for developing a scientifically robust and somewhat versatile methodology for the evaluation of 'intrinsic' and 'specific' groundwater vulnerability for 'resource' and 'source' protection under varying hydrogeologic and hydro-climatic conditions. It is emphasized that more studies should be devoted to vulnerability assessment for 'source' protection using 'Source-Pathway-Receptor/Target' approach. Also, spatial decision support systems should be developed using modern tools/techniques including artificial intelligence to improve decision-making process for protecting vital groundwater resources.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 927
页数:27
相关论文
共 357 条
[31]   Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: A case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand [J].
Baalousha, Husam .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (02) :240-246
[32]   A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan [J].
Babiker, IS ;
Mohamed, MAA ;
Hiyama, T ;
Kato, K .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 345 (1-3) :127-140
[33]  
Bachmat Y., 1987, Proceedings of the International Conference on Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants, P297
[34]   Application of DRASTIC and extension theory in the groundwater vulnerability evaluation [J].
Bai, Liping ;
Wang, Yeyao ;
Meng, Fansheng .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 26 (03) :381-391
[35]   Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources [J].
Bakalowicz, M .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 13 (01) :148-160
[36]   WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA DELINEATION - LINKING FLOW MODEL WITH GIS [J].
BAKER, CP ;
BRADLEY, MD ;
BOBIAK, SMK .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1993, 119 (02) :275-287
[37]  
BANTON O, 1989, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, V4, P285, DOI 10.1016/0169-7722(89)90013-2
[38]  
Barber C., 1996, Hydrogeology J, V4, P6, DOI DOI 10.1007/S100400050078
[39]   Hydrogeology and vulnerability map (Epik method) of the "Supramonte" karstic system, north-central Sardinia [J].
Barrocu, Giovanni ;
Muzzu, Michele ;
Uras, Gabriele .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 51 (05) :701-706
[40]   Preferential flow in water-repellent sands [J].
Bauters, TWJ ;
DiCarlo, DA ;
Steenhuis, TS ;
Parlange, JY .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1998, 62 (05) :1185-1190