Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

被引:9
作者
Carroll, Paul A. [1 ]
Jacob, Nithin [1 ]
Yeung, Jonathan C. [1 ]
Darling, Gail E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Network, Div Thorac Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; CANCER; MULTICENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is performed in nearly 50% of patients worldwide. The effectiveness of the technique arises from a single randomized control trial and multiple single series cohorts. Consistent reporting of complications is varied. We describe our experience of transitioning to MIE compared with open esophagectomy (OE) with the use of Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardized complication benchmark definitions. Methods. Between 2007 and 2017, all patients undergoing esophagectomy were identified with the use of a prospectively curated database. Complications were defined by the ECCG and graded with the Clavien-Dindo (most severe complication) and comprehensive complication index (complexity of complications during hospital stay). Results. Of 383 patients, 299 (76%) were men with a median age of 64.5 years (range, 56-72 years). MIE was performed in 49.6%. No differences were found in age, histologic finding (P = .222), pT stage (P = .136), or nodal positivity (P = .918). Stage 3 cancers accounted for 42.0% of OEs and 47.9% of MIEs. A thoracic anastomosis was more frequent in MIEs (156 of 190; 82.1%) than in OEs (113 of 193; 58.5%; P = .001). Frequency, severity (Clavien-Dindo), and complexity (comprehensive complication index) of complications were better in the MIE group, without compromising operative outcomes. No differences were identified in individual complication groupings or grade in MIEs compared with OEs (pneumonia: 19.5% versus 26.9% ([P = .09]; intensive care unit readmission: 7.4% versus 9.3% [P = .519]; atrial fibrillation: 11.1% versus 6.7% [P = .082], or grade of leak [P = .99]). Conclusions. These results compare favorably to those reported by ECCG. MIE can be the standard approach for surgical management of esophageal cancer. Introduction of the approach in each surgeon's practice should be benchmarked to international standards. (C) 2020 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 388
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Ahmadi, Negar
    Crnic, Agnes
    Seely, Andrew J.
    Sundaresan, Sudhir R.
    Villeneuve, P. James
    Maziak, Donna E.
    Shamji, Farid M.
    Gilbert, Sebastien
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (04): : 1892 - 1900
  • [2] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) : 1887 - 1892
  • [3] Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy A Systematic Review
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Strong, Sean
    McNair, Angus G. K.
    Brookes, Sara T.
    Crosby, Tom
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (04) : 658 - 666
  • [4] Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications
    Briez, N.
    Piessen, G.
    Torres, F.
    Lebuffe, G.
    Triboulet, J. -P.
    Mariette, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (11) : 1547 - 1553
  • [5] Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review
    Dantoc, Marc M.
    Cox, Michael R.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (03) : 486 - 494
  • [6] Impact of Increasing Prevalence of Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy on Open Prostatectomy Observed in the National Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Hofer, Matthias D.
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    Cashy, John
    Kundu, Shilajit
    Zhao, Lee C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [7] Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
    Klevebro, F.
    Scandavini, C. M.
    Kamiya, S.
    Nilsson, M.
    Lundell, L.
    Rouvelas, I.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2018, 31 (10)
  • [8] Benchmarking Complications Associated With Esophagectomy
    Low, Donald E.
    Kuppusamy, Madhan Kumar
    Alderson, Derek
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Darling, Gail
    Davies, Andrew
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Hardwick, Richard
    Hoelscher, Arnulf
    Hofstetter, Wayne
    Jobe, Blair
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Law, Simon
    Mariette, Christophe
    Maynard, Nick
    Morse, Christopher R.
    Nafteux, Philippe
    Pera, Manuel
    Pramesh, C. S.
    Puig, Sonia
    Reynolds, John V.
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Smithers, Mark
    Wijnhoven, B. P. L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (02) : 291 - 298
  • [9] International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
    Low, Donald E.
    Alderson, Derek
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Law, Simon Ying Kit
    Lerut, Toni E.
    Maynard, Nick
    Pera, Manuel
    Peters, Jeffrey H.
    Pramesh, C. S.
    Reynolds, John V.
    Smithers, B. Mark
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 286 - 294
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Results of a Prospective Phase II Multicenter Trial-the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2202) Study
    Luketich, James D.
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Franchetti, Yoko
    Catalano, Paul J.
    Swanson, Scott
    Sugarbaker, David J.
    De Hoyos, Alberto
    Maddaus, Michael A.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    Benson, Al B.
    Fernando, Hiran C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (04) : 702 - 707