Patients or Volunteers? The Impact of Motivation for Trial Participation on the Efficacy of Patient Decision Aids: A Secondary Analysis of a Cochrane Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Brown, James G. [1 ]
Joyce, Kerry E. [1 ]
Stacey, Dawn [2 ]
Thomson, Richard G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
decision making; choice behavior; decision aids; decision support techniques; patient preference; environment; motivation; patient participation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ALTRUISM SCALE; CHOICE; HETEROGENEITY; KNOWLEDGE; CANCER; WOMEN; CARE; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X15579172
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Efficacy of patient decision aids (PtDAs) may be influenced by trial participants' identity either as patients seeking to benefit personally from involvement or as volunteers supporting the research effort. Aim. To determine if study characteristics indicative of participants' trial identity might influence PtDA efficacy. Methods. We undertook exploratory subgroup meta-analysis of the 2011 Cochrane review of PtDAs, including trials that compared PtDA with usual care for treatment decisions. We extracted data on whether participants initiated the care pathway, setting, practitioner interactions, and 6 outcome variables (knowledge, risk perception, decisional conflict, feeling informed, feeling clear about values, and participation). The main subgroup analysis categorized trials as volunteerism or patienthood on the basis of whether participants initiated the care pathway. A supplementary subgroup analysis categorized trials on the basis of whether any volunteerism factors were present (participants had not initiated the care pathway, had attended a research setting, or had a face-to-face interaction with a researcher). Results. Twenty-nine trials were included. Compared with volunteerism trials, pooled effect sizes were higher in patienthood trials (where participants initiated the care pathway) for knowledge, decisional conflict, feeling informed, feeling clear, and participation. The subgroup difference was statistically significant for knowledge only (P = 0.03). When trials were compared on the basis of whether volunteerism factors were present, knowledge was significantly greater in patienthood trials (P < 0.001), but there was otherwise no consistent pattern of differences in effects across outcomes. Conclusions. There is a tendency toward greater PtDA efficacy in trials in which participants initiate the pathway of care. Knowledge acquisition appears to be greater in trials where participants are predominantly patients rather than volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 435
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Impact of Sociodemographic Patient Characteristics on the Efficacy of Decision Aids: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Trials
    Coylewright, Megan
    Branda, Megan
    Inselman, Jonathan W.
    Shah, Nilay
    Hess, Erik
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Montori, Victor M.
    Ting, Henry H.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2014, 7 (03): : 360 - 367
  • [12] Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ivlev, Ilya
    Jerabkova, Silvie
    Mishra, Meenakshi
    Cook, Lily A.
    Eden, Karen B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 55 (06) : 896 - 907
  • [13] The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis
    Scalia, Peter
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Berkowitz, Julia L.
    Ramesh, Nithya P.
    Faber, Marjan J.
    Kremer, Jan A. M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (05) : 817 - 841
  • [14] Effectiveness of computerised decision aids for patients with chronic diseases in shared decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Chih-Jung
    Yeh, Tzu-Pei
    Chu, Ginger
    Ho, Ya-Fang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (07) : 2732 - 2754
  • [15] Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Dan
    Zhou, Jie
    Fan, Tianli
    Chang, Jing
    Qiu, Yuzhen
    Zhuang, Zexiang
    Ma, Juanjuan
    Zeng, Li
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2022, 21 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [16] Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Volk, Robert J.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Saraykar, Smita S.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 779 - 791
  • [17] Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review
    Adisso, Evehouenou Lionel
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Gogovor, Amede
    Legare, France
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [18] Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients’ relational autonomy
    Jennifer A. H. Bell
    Lynda G. Balneaves
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 : 1169 - 1196
  • [19] Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy
    Bell, Jennifer A. H.
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (04) : 1169 - 1196
  • [20] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IDPAS)
    Yen, Renata W.
    Smith, Jenna
    Engel, Jaclyn
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    Smith, Sian K.
    Mancini, Julien
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Malley, A. James
    Leyenaar, JoAnna K.
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 870 - 896