Patients or Volunteers? The Impact of Motivation for Trial Participation on the Efficacy of Patient Decision Aids: A Secondary Analysis of a Cochrane Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Brown, James G. [1 ]
Joyce, Kerry E. [1 ]
Stacey, Dawn [2 ]
Thomson, Richard G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
decision making; choice behavior; decision aids; decision support techniques; patient preference; environment; motivation; patient participation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ALTRUISM SCALE; CHOICE; HETEROGENEITY; KNOWLEDGE; CANCER; WOMEN; CARE; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X15579172
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Efficacy of patient decision aids (PtDAs) may be influenced by trial participants' identity either as patients seeking to benefit personally from involvement or as volunteers supporting the research effort. Aim. To determine if study characteristics indicative of participants' trial identity might influence PtDA efficacy. Methods. We undertook exploratory subgroup meta-analysis of the 2011 Cochrane review of PtDAs, including trials that compared PtDA with usual care for treatment decisions. We extracted data on whether participants initiated the care pathway, setting, practitioner interactions, and 6 outcome variables (knowledge, risk perception, decisional conflict, feeling informed, feeling clear about values, and participation). The main subgroup analysis categorized trials as volunteerism or patienthood on the basis of whether participants initiated the care pathway. A supplementary subgroup analysis categorized trials on the basis of whether any volunteerism factors were present (participants had not initiated the care pathway, had attended a research setting, or had a face-to-face interaction with a researcher). Results. Twenty-nine trials were included. Compared with volunteerism trials, pooled effect sizes were higher in patienthood trials (where participants initiated the care pathway) for knowledge, decisional conflict, feeling informed, feeling clear, and participation. The subgroup difference was statistically significant for knowledge only (P = 0.03). When trials were compared on the basis of whether volunteerism factors were present, knowledge was significantly greater in patienthood trials (P < 0.001), but there was otherwise no consistent pattern of differences in effects across outcomes. Conclusions. There is a tendency toward greater PtDA efficacy in trials in which participants initiate the pathway of care. Knowledge acquisition appears to be greater in trials where participants are predominantly patients rather than volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 435
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Bennett, Carol
    Murray, Mary Ann
    Mullan, Sarah
    Legare, France
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (03) : E22 - E33
  • [2] Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis
    Adeli, Mahin
    Zayeri, Farid
    Rasekhi, Aliakbar
    Kiani, Zahra
    Amini, Payam
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [3] Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Tandon, Vickram J.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    MacEachern, Mark P.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [4] Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review
    Agbadje, Titilayo Tatiana
    Riganti, Paula
    Adisso, Evehouenou Lionel
    Adekpedjou, Rheda
    Boucher, Alexandrine
    Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli
    Franco, Juan Victor Ariel
    Yanzi, Maria Victoria Ruiz
    Legare, France
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [5] Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial
    Becker, Christoph
    Gross, Sebastian
    Gamp, Martina
    Beck, Katharina
    Amacher, Simon A.
    Mueller, Jonas
    Bohren, Chantal
    Blatter, Rene
    Schaefert, Rainer
    Schuetz, Philipp
    Leuppi, Joerg
    Bassetti, Stefano
    Hunziker, Sabina
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 38 (05) : 1180 - 1189
  • [6] Effects of patient decision aids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zimeng
    Jin, Yinghui
    Lu, Cui
    Luo, Ruzhen
    Wang, Jiayao
    Liu, Yanhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (06)
  • [7] Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients
    Wang, Yifan
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Logan, Shanna
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [8] Decision Aids for Patients Facing a Surgical Treatment Decision A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Knops, Anouk M.
    Legemate, Dink A.
    Goossens, Astrid
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (05) : 860 - 866
  • [9] Patient Decision Aids to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Poprzeczny, Amanda J.
    Stocking, Katie
    Showell, Marian
    Duffy, James M. N.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02) : 444 - 451
  • [10] Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gans, Emma A.
    van Mun, Liza A. M.
    de Groot, Janke F.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Rake, Ester A.
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    Festen, Suzanne
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 116