Tumor growth modeling from clinical trials reveals synergistic anticancer effect of the capecitabine and docetaxel combination in metastatic breast cancer

被引:34
作者
Frances, N. [1 ]
Claret, L. [2 ]
Bruno, R. [2 ]
Iliadis, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille 2, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmacokinet, UMR MD3, F-13385 Marseille 5, France
[2] A Certara, Marseille, France
关键词
Modeling; Interaction; Drug combination; Clinical data; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY; TIME; PERFORMANCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-011-1628-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Most of the cancer chemotherapy treatments employ drugs in combination. For combination treatments, it is relevant to assess interaction between two or more anticancer agents used in clinics. Based on clinical data and using modeling techniques, the work analyzes the pharmacodynamic interaction between capecitabine and docetaxel used in combination in metastatic breast cancer. We developed mathematical models to describe tumor growth inhibition profile under treatment based on Phase II and Phase III clinical data of capecitabine and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer. Model parameters were estimated by population approach with NONMEM(A (R)) on single-agent and combination data. Simulations were performed using MATLAB. Capecitabine and docetaxel combination in metastatic breast cancer results in a synergistic effect as compared with the simple additive effects of single-agent treatments. Docetaxel is more efficient than capecitabine at the start of treatment but develops resistance faster. Modeling revealed no resistance of capecitabine for the combination data. Modeling could be a powerful tool to design the most advantageous combination regimen for capecitabine and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer in order to increase the time before regrowth and decrease the tumor size at regrowth.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1419
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE NONMEM SYSTEM [J].
BEAL, S ;
SHEINER, L .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1980, 34 (02) :118-119
[2]   Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer [J].
Blum, JL ;
Jones, SE ;
Buzdar, AU ;
LoRusso, PM ;
Kuter, I ;
Vogel, C ;
Osterwalder, B ;
Burger, HU ;
Brown, CS ;
Griffin, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (02) :485-493
[3]  
CLARET L, 2006, LONGITUDINAL MODEL T
[4]   Individualised cancer chemotherapy: Strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation - A review [J].
de Jonge, ME ;
Huitema, ADR ;
Schellens, JHM ;
Rodenhuis, S ;
Beijnen, JH .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2005, 44 (02) :147-173
[5]   Magnitude of response with myeloma frontline therapy does not predict outcome: Importance of time to progression in southwest oncology group chemotherapy trials [J].
Durie, BGM ;
Jacobson, J ;
Barlogie, B ;
Crowley, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) :1857-1863
[6]  
FRANCES N, 2008, MODELING LONGITUDINA
[7]  
FREI E, 1972, CANCER RES, V32, P2593
[8]   Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to predict synergistic effects of co-administered anti-cancer agents [J].
Goteti, Kosalaram ;
Garner, C. Edwin ;
Utley, Lucas ;
Dai, Jing ;
Ashwell, Susan ;
Moustakas, Demetri T. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Schwartz, Gary K. ;
Kern, Steven E. ;
Zabludoff, Sonya ;
Brassil, Patrick J. .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (02) :245-254
[9]   Optimizing drug regimens in cancer chemotherapy by an efficacy-toxicity mathematical model [J].
Iliadis, A ;
Barbolosi, D .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 33 (03) :211-226
[10]   Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: Definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model [J].
Jacqmin, P. ;
Snoeck, E. ;
van Schaick, E. A. ;
Gieschke, R. ;
Pillai, P. ;
Steimer, J. -L. ;
Girard, P. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2007, 34 (01) :57-85