Predictors of positive growth after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study

被引:48
作者
Hawley, Carol A. [1 ]
Joseph, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, CTRG, Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Ctr Social Work, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
brain injury; outcome; follow-up; post-traumatic growth; trauma;
D O I
10.1080/02699050802064607
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Primary objective: To investigate long-term positive psychological growth in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to relate growth to injury characteristics and early outcomes. Research design: Longitudinal study. Method and procedure: Long-term follow-up of a group of TBI survivors recruited between 1991-1995. In 2004, 240 of the 563 original participants were invited to take part in a follow-up study. At follow-up, survivors completed the Positive Changes in Outlook Questionnaire (CiOP) along with a structured interview/questionnaire which permitted a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score to be assigned. Results: One hundred and sixty-five TBI survivors completed both questionnaire and CiOP. One hundred and three (62%) participants had suffered severe TBI, 24 (15%) moderate and 38 (23%) mild. Mean length of follow-up was 11.5 years post-injury (range 9-25 years). On the GOSE at follow-up, 43 (26%) had severe disability; 72 (44%) moderate disability; and 50 (30%) good recovery. Scores on the CiOP indicated positive psychological growth in over half of the sample, as evidenced by agreement with items such as 'I don't take life for granted anymore' and 'I value my relationships much more now'. CiOP total scores did not correlate with any injury or early outcome variables. However, at long-term follow-up there was a negative correlation between positive growth and anxiety and depression. Conclusion: Survivors of mild, moderate and severe TBI showed evidence of long-term positive changes in outlook.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 435
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Adams N., 1996, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, V17, P75, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1996.tb01077.x, DOI 10.1002/J.1467-8438.1996.TB01077.X]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury
[3]  
Brooks M.D., 1987, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V2, P1, DOI [10.1097/00001199-198709000-00003, DOI 10.1097/00001199-198709000-00003]
[4]   THE 5 YEAR OUTCOME OF SEVERE BLUNT HEAD-INJURY - A RELATIVES VIEW [J].
BROOKS, N ;
CAMPSIE, L ;
SYMINGTON, C ;
BEATTIE, A ;
MCKINLAY, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (07) :764-770
[5]  
CONZEN M, 1992, Brain Injury, V6, P45, DOI 10.3109/02699059209008121
[6]  
Hall K.M., 1993, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, V8, P60, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00008, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00008]
[7]  
HAWLEY CA, 2000, BRIT J THERAPY REHAB, V7, P116
[8]  
JENNETT B, 1975, LANCET, V1, P480
[9]   DISABILITY AFTER SEVERE HEAD-INJURY - OBSERVATIONS ON THE USE OF THE GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE [J].
JENNETT, B ;
SNOEK, J ;
BOND, MR ;
BROOKS, N .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1981, 44 (04) :285-293
[10]  
JOSEPH S, 1993, J TRAUMA STRESS, V6, P271, DOI 10.1002/jts.2490060209