Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins

被引:37
作者
Harvin, John A. [1 ]
Lahat, Guy [1 ]
Correa, Arlene M. [1 ]
Lee, Jared [1 ]
Maru, Dipen [1 ]
Ajani, Jaffer [1 ]
Marom, Edith M. [1 ]
Welsh, James [1 ]
Bhutani, Manoop S. [1 ]
Walsh, Garret [1 ]
Roth, Jack [1 ]
Mehran, Reza [1 ]
Vaporciyan, Ara [1 ]
Rice, David [1 ]
Swisher, Stephen [1 ]
Hofstetter, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
PHASE-III TRIAL; RESECTION MARGIN; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; INVOLVEMENT; CARCINOMA; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The incidence and consequence of an isolated involved circumferential radial margin (CRM) after resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma in the setting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has not been reported. We aimed to determine the frequency and significance of a close (<1 mm) or involved CRM in patients undergoing esophagectomy after CRT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients undergoing resection from 1997 to 2008 for esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant CRT. A positive CRM was defined as microscopic tumor at or less than 1 mm of the radial margin. An R1 resection was tumor at the radial margin. Only patients with ypT3 or greater tumors were included. R2 resections were excluded. Statistical comparisons were performed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: A total of 160 patients met the inclusion criteria, 42 (26%) had a positive CRM. The median survival did not significantly differ between the CRM-negative and -positive groups (28 vs 50 months, P = .84). A propensity score matching analysis also failed to find a significant difference in outcomes. When analyzed by tumor present at the margin (R1), R0 patients had a longer median survival compared with R1 patients (28 vs 8 months, P = .01). This difference, however, was not seen on propensity score matching. Conclusions: Resections of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma with residual transmural viable tumor after CRT frequently showed involvement of the radial margin with tumor either close to or at the margin. Tumor close (<1 mm) to the radial margin did not result in a significant decrease in overall or disease-free survival or increase in local recurrence. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:412-20)
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 420
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Adelstein DJ, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P1011
[2]   Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial [J].
Burmeister, BH ;
Smithers, BM ;
Gebski, V ;
Fitzgerald, L ;
Simes, RJ ;
Devitt, P ;
Ackland, S ;
Gotley, DC ;
Joseph, D ;
Millar, J ;
North, J ;
Walpole, ET ;
Denham, JW .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) :659-668
[3]   Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin Distance on Locoregional Recurrence and Survival after Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J].
Chao, Yin-Kai ;
Yeh, Chi-Ju ;
Chang, Hsien-Kun ;
Tseng, Chen-Kan ;
Chu, Yin-Yi ;
Hsieh, Ming-Ju ;
Wu, Yi-Cheng ;
Liu, Hui-Ping .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :529-534
[4]   Assessment of Criteria and Clinical Significance of Circumferential Resection Margins in Esophageal Cancer [J].
Deeter, Matthew ;
Dorer, Russell ;
Kuppusamy, Madhan Kumar ;
Koehler, Richard P. ;
Low, Donald E. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (07) :618-624
[5]   Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer [J].
Dexter, SPL ;
Sue-Ling, H ;
McMahon, MJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Mapstone, N ;
Martin, IG .
GUT, 2001, 48 (05) :667-670
[6]   Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer [J].
Hofstetter, W ;
Swisher, SG ;
Correa, AM ;
Hess, K ;
Putnam, JB ;
Ajani, JA ;
Dolormente, M ;
Francisco, R ;
Komaki, RR ;
Lara, A ;
Martin, F ;
Rice, DC ;
Sarabia, AJ ;
Smythe, WR ;
Vaporciyan, AA ;
Walsh, GL ;
Roth, JA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) :376-385
[7]   Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer [J].
Khan, OA ;
Fitzgerald, JJ ;
Soomro, I ;
Beggs, FD ;
Morgan, WE ;
Duffy, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (10) :1549-1552
[8]   SIGNIFICANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER [J].
SAGAR, PM ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
MCMAHON, MJ ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (11) :1386-1388
[9]   Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin and Stratification of N1 Category [J].
Saha, Arin Kumar ;
Sutton, Christopher ;
Rotimi, Olorunda ;
Dexter, Simon ;
Sue-Ling, Henry ;
Sarela, Abeezar I. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) :1364-1370
[10]   Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route [J].
Scheepers, J. J. G. ;
van der Peet, D. L. ;
Veenhof, A. A. F. A. ;
Cuesta, M. A. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2009, 22 (01) :42-48