Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the management of symptomatic spinal metastasis

被引:32
|
作者
Hamad, Abdulkader [1 ]
Vachtsevanos, Leonidas [1 ]
Cattell, Andrew [1 ]
Ockendon, Matthew [1 ]
Balain, Birender [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Jones Agnes Hunt Orthopaed Hosp, Ctr Spinal Studies, Oswestry SY10 7AG, Shrops, England
关键词
Metastasis; minimally invasive surgery; spinal cord compression; karnofsky; percutaneous; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; CORD COMPRESSION; CANCER-PATIENTS; VERTEBRAL BODY; CEMENT LEAKAGE; TUMOR SURGERY; KYPHOPLASTY; FRACTURES; THORACOLUMBAR;
D O I
10.1080/02688697.2017.1297374
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Symptomatic metastatic spinal disease is on the increase. Minimally invasive spinal surgery has been associated with a lower complication profile when compared to traditional open methods; however there is paucity of literature evaluating the place of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the management of spinal metastases. The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) using PPSF with or without mini-decompression in the management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Material and Methods: This is a single institution prospective study of 51 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal disease treated with PPSF. Patients presenting with pathological compression fractures and mechanical instability had PPSF, and those with radiological and/or clinical metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) underwent an additional mini-decompression. Data collected included patient demographics, Karnofsky's performance status (KPS), pain scores and neurology. Other data included number and location of involved levels, number of instrumented levels, blood loss, accuracy of screw placement and complications. Results: Of the 51 patients, 49 could be successfully treated with MISS (26 females and 23 males). 26 patients (55%) required a mini-decompression. 27 patients (55%) had improvement in KPS by at least 10 points (p < 0.0005). Only 2 patients (4%) had a worsening of KPS, due to other coexisting problems. Six of the 13 patients improved their neurology by one Frankel grade following surgery and 95% reported improvement in pain. Mean blood loss was 92mls for the fixation only group and 222mls for those requiring mini-decompression, with no other differences between these two surgical groups. Screw positioning was excellent in 91%, with 98% having uncompromised bony hold. Only two patients required revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Conclusion: MISS using PPSF is a safe and reproducible technique that maintains or improves functional outcome in the vast majority of patients presenting with spinal metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Sivabalan, Praveenan
    Li, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 829 - 835
  • [42] Current and emerging concepts in non-invasive and minimally invasive management of spine metastasis
    Bhatt, Aashish D.
    Schuler, John C.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    Woo, Shiao Y.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2013, 39 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [43] Global Trends and Hotspots of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric
    Sang, Dacheng
    Guo, Jinyang
    Meng, Hanlu
    Zhang, Luofei
    Sang, Hongpeng
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 117 - 132
  • [44] Minimally invasive surgery for spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Beck, Juergen
    Hubbe, Ulrich
    Klingler, Jan-Helge
    Roelz, Roland
    Kraus, Luisa Mona
    Volz, Florian
    Luetzen, Niklas
    Urbach, Horst
    Kieselbach, Kristin
    Fung, Christian
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (01) : 147 - 152
  • [45] Minimally invasive surgery for intradural spinal meningioma: A new standard? A comparative study between minimally invasive and open approaches
    Dauleac, C.
    Leroy, H-A
    Karnoub, M-A
    Obled, L.
    Mertens, P.
    Assaker, R.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2022, 68 (04) : 379 - 385
  • [46] Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Ng, Karen Ka Man
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (02): : 1 - 11
  • [47] Application and Development of Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases
    Hao, Lu
    Chen, Xi
    Chen, Qiuyan
    Xu, Yuzhong
    Zhang, Baozhu
    Yang, Zhe
    Zhong, Junxin
    Zhou, Qing
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [48] Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Fixation Techniques for Metastatic Spinal Disease
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Thayaparan, Ganesha K.
    Fairhall, Jacob M.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 6 (03) : 187 - 195
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Approach for the Resection of Spinal Neoplasm
    Haji, Faizal A.
    Cenic, Aleksa
    Crevier, Louis
    Murty, Naresh
    Reddy, Kesava
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (15) : E1018 - E1026
  • [50] Less Invasive Palliative Surgery for Spinal Metastases
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Sohn, Seil
    Lee, Sungjoon
    Park, Sung Bae
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (07) : 499 - 503