Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the management of symptomatic spinal metastasis

被引:32
|
作者
Hamad, Abdulkader [1 ]
Vachtsevanos, Leonidas [1 ]
Cattell, Andrew [1 ]
Ockendon, Matthew [1 ]
Balain, Birender [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Jones Agnes Hunt Orthopaed Hosp, Ctr Spinal Studies, Oswestry SY10 7AG, Shrops, England
关键词
Metastasis; minimally invasive surgery; spinal cord compression; karnofsky; percutaneous; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; CORD COMPRESSION; CANCER-PATIENTS; VERTEBRAL BODY; CEMENT LEAKAGE; TUMOR SURGERY; KYPHOPLASTY; FRACTURES; THORACOLUMBAR;
D O I
10.1080/02688697.2017.1297374
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Symptomatic metastatic spinal disease is on the increase. Minimally invasive spinal surgery has been associated with a lower complication profile when compared to traditional open methods; however there is paucity of literature evaluating the place of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the management of spinal metastases. The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) using PPSF with or without mini-decompression in the management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Material and Methods: This is a single institution prospective study of 51 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal disease treated with PPSF. Patients presenting with pathological compression fractures and mechanical instability had PPSF, and those with radiological and/or clinical metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) underwent an additional mini-decompression. Data collected included patient demographics, Karnofsky's performance status (KPS), pain scores and neurology. Other data included number and location of involved levels, number of instrumented levels, blood loss, accuracy of screw placement and complications. Results: Of the 51 patients, 49 could be successfully treated with MISS (26 females and 23 males). 26 patients (55%) required a mini-decompression. 27 patients (55%) had improvement in KPS by at least 10 points (p < 0.0005). Only 2 patients (4%) had a worsening of KPS, due to other coexisting problems. Six of the 13 patients improved their neurology by one Frankel grade following surgery and 95% reported improvement in pain. Mean blood loss was 92mls for the fixation only group and 222mls for those requiring mini-decompression, with no other differences between these two surgical groups. Screw positioning was excellent in 91%, with 98% having uncompromised bony hold. Only two patients required revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Conclusion: MISS using PPSF is a safe and reproducible technique that maintains or improves functional outcome in the vast majority of patients presenting with spinal metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up
    Mossa-Basha, Mahmud
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Yuh, William T. C.
    Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Lo, Simon S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1103)
  • [22] Computer-assisted Spinal Navigation: An Intraoperative Tool in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery
    Smucker, Joseph D.
    Ramme, Austin J.
    Sasso, Rick C.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [23] Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Hansen-Algenstaedt, Nils
    Kwan, Mun Keong
    Algenstaedt, Petra
    Chiu, Chee Kidd
    Viezens, Lennart
    Chan, Teik Seng
    Lee, Chee Kean
    Wellbrock, Jasmin
    Chan, Chris Yin Wei
    Schaefer, Christian
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (10) : 789 - 797
  • [24] The management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study between conservative management, traditional open spinal surgery and minimally interventional spinal surgery
    Kumar, Amit
    Aujla, Randeep
    Lee, Christopher
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4
  • [25] Less Is More: Evaluating the Benefits of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery
    Mohamed, Ali A.
    Alshaibi, Rakan
    Faragalla, Steven
    Flynn, Garrett
    Khan, Asad
    Sargent, Emma
    Mohamed, Youssef
    Moriconi, Camberly
    Williams, Cooper
    Karve, Zev
    Colome, Daniel
    Johansen, Phillip Mitchell
    Lucke-Wold, Brandon
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [26] The minimally invasive spinal surgery in the treatment of posterior edge separation
    Deng, Zi-Yang
    Yang, Wen-Jun
    Han, Lu
    Gao, Feng
    Li, Chen-Chen
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Hui-Jiu
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (04) : 1937 - 1943
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense?
    Shamji, Mohammed F.
    Goldstein, Christina L.
    Wang, Michael
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 : S108 - S115
  • [28] Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity
    Januszewski, Jacob
    Vivas, Andrew C.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [29] The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Limitations
    Paturu, Mounica R.
    Woo, Joshua
    Rocos, Brett
    Passias, Peter
    Haglund, Michael
    Orndorff, Douglas
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Jones, Kristen
    Than, Khoi D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S129 - S138
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery: How to Keep out of Trouble
    Sharif, Salman
    Shaikh, Yousuf
    Peev, Nikolay
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 : 517 - 526