Improvement in oncology practice performance through voluntary participation in the quality oncology practice initiative

被引:92
作者
Jacobson, Joseph O. [1 ]
Neuss, Michael N.
McNiff, Kristen K.
Kadlubek, Pamela
Thacker, Leroy R., II
Song, Frank
Eisenberg, Peter D.
Simone, Joseph V.
机构
[1] N Shore Med Ctr, Dept Med, Salem, MA 01970 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2992
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) became available to all American Society of Clinical Oncology member physicians in 2006 as a voluntary medical oncology practice-based quality measurement and improvement project. QOPI assesses practice performance for a series of evidence- and consensus-based process measures, relying on practices to complete structured chart reviews and submit data via a secure Web-based portal. Methods This analysis focused on the 71 practices that participated in both the March and September 2006 data collections (7,624 charts abstracted in March and 10,240 in September). Among 33 measures common to both collections, five measures were closely correlated, and 28 are included in the final analysis. Composite scores were created for six different domains of care. Statistical significance was tested on both absolute changes and relative changes (relative failure reduction) of quality measures from baseline to follow-up and between the lower quartile and all other quartiles. Results Practice performance on individual measures varied between 18.8% and 98.6%. Mean overall performance as measured by a composite score increased from 78.7% in March to 82.3% in September (P < .05). Improvement was most marked among practices originally performing in the bottom quartile. Using a composite score, the absolute and relative performance for the bottom quartile improved by 27% and 35%, respectively, statistically superior to that of all others. Conclusion Practices that participated in QOPI demonstrated improved performance in self-reported process measures, with the greatest improvement demonstrated in initially low-performing practices.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1898
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample [J].
Asch, SM ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Hogan, MM ;
Hayward, RA ;
Shekelle, P ;
Rubenstein, L ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, J ;
Kerr, EA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :938-945
[2]   Disseminating innovations in health care [J].
Berwick, DM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (15) :1969-1975
[3]   EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03) :166-206
[4]   Perspective - Closing the gap between science and practice: The need for professional leadership [J].
Eagle, KA ;
Garson, AJ ;
Beller, GA ;
Sennett, C .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (02) :196-201
[5]   The STS National Database: Current changes and challenges for the new millennium [J].
Ferguson, TB ;
Dziuban, SW ;
Edwards, FH ;
Eiken, MC ;
Shroyer, ALW ;
Pairolero, PC ;
Anderson, RP ;
Grover, FL .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (03) :680-691
[6]   Physician Specialty societies and the development of physician performance measures [J].
Ferris, Timothy G. ;
Vogeli, Christine ;
Marder, Jessica ;
Sennett, Cary S. ;
Campbell, Eric G. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (06) :1712-1719
[7]  
Fleiss JL., 2013, Statistical methods for rates and proportions
[8]  
Hewitt M, 1999, ENSURING QUALITY CAN
[9]  
Jencks SF, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V289, P2647
[10]   The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures [J].
Jha, Ashish K. ;
Orav, E. John ;
Li, Zhonghe ;
Epstein, Arnold M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (04) :1104-1110