Toward Quantitative Definition of Explanation Ability of Fuzzy Rule-based Classifiers

被引:0
作者
Ishibuchi, Hisao [1 ]
Nojima, Yusuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Prefecture Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Intelligent Syst, Naka Ku, Osaka 5998531, Japan
来源
IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ 2011) | 2011年
关键词
pattern classification; fuzzy systems; fuzzy rule-based classifiers; explanation ability; interpretability; complexity; DECISION-TREE; CLASSIFICATION; INTERPRETABILITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Explanation ability of a fuzzy rule-based classifier is its ability to explain why an input pattern is classified as a particular class in a convincing way. This ability is important especially when fuzzy rule-based classifiers are used as support systems for human users. This is because human users often want to know why the current input pattern is classified as a particular class. The explanation ability looks similar to the interpretability. They are, however, clearly different concepts. Whereas the explanation ability is directly related to the classification of each pattern, the interpretability is usually independent of classification results. The interpretability has been taken into account in multiobjective design of fuzzy rule-based classifiers. However, the explanation ability has not been used for fuzzy rule-based classifier design. This is because its quantitative definition is very difficult. In this paper, we discuss various factors that are related to quantitative definition of the explanation ability of fuzzy rule-based classifiers. Using simple numerical examples, we explain that the complexity minimization of fuzzy rule-based classifiers does not always lead to the explanation ability maximization. We also explain that the accuracy of fuzzy rules is related to the explanation ability.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 556
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Data-driven generation of compact, accurate, and linguistically sound fuzzy classifiers based on a decision-tree initialization [J].
Abonyi, J ;
Roubos, JA ;
Szeifert, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2003, 32 (01) :1-21
[2]   Looking for a good fuzzy system interpretability index: An experimental approach [J].
Alonso, Jose M. ;
Magdalena, Luis ;
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Gil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2009, 51 (01) :115-134
[3]   Context adaptation of fuzzy systems through a multi-objective evolutionary approach based on a novel interpretability index [J].
Botta, Alessio ;
Lazzerini, Beatrice ;
Marcelloni, Francesco ;
Stefanescu, Dan C. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 13 (05) :437-449
[4]  
Casillas J., 2003, Accuracy improvements in linguistic fuzzy modelling
[5]  
Casillas J., 2003, INTERPRETABILITY ISS
[6]   Including a simplicity criterion in the selection of the best rule in a genetic fuzzy learning algorithm [J].
Castillo, L ;
González, A ;
Pérez, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 120 (02) :309-321
[7]  
Cordón O, 1999, INT J APPROX REASON, V20, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0888-613X(98)10021-X
[8]   Multi-objective genetic fuzzy classifiers for imbalanced and cost-sensitive datasets [J].
Ducange, Pietro ;
Lazzerini, Beatrice ;
Marcelloni, Francesco .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (07) :713-728
[9]   Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented review [J].
Guillaume, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2001, 9 (03) :426-443
[10]   Fuzzy data mining for interesting generalized association rules [J].
Hong, TP ;
Lin, KY ;
Wang, SL .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 138 (02) :255-269