The State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review

被引:23
作者
Peiris-John, Roshini [1 ,3 ]
Selak, Vanessa [1 ]
Robb, Gillian [1 ]
Kool, Bridget [1 ]
Wells, Susan [1 ]
Sadler, Lynn [2 ]
Wise, Michelle R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sect Epidemiol & Biostat, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Auckland City Hosp, Womens Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Medical student; undergraduate medical education; quality improvement; PATIENT SAFETY; CLINICAL AUDIT; HEALTH-CARE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; PHYSICIANS; TRAINEES; PROGRAM; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: While teaching patient safety and quality improvement (QI) skills to medical students is endorsed as being important, best practice for achieving learner outcomes in QI is particularly unclear. We systematically reviewed QI curricula for medical students to identify approaches to QI training that are associated with positive learner outcomes. METHODS: We searched databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus) and article bibliographies for studies published from 2009 to 2018. Studies evaluating QI teaching for medical students in any setting and reporting learner outcomes were included. Educational content, teaching format, achievement of learning outcomes, and methodological features were abstracted. Outcomes assessed were learners' satisfaction, attitudes, knowledge and skills, changes in behavior and clinical processes, and benefits to patients. RESULTS: Twenty of 25 curricula targeted medical students exclusively. Most curricula were well accepted by students (11/13 studies), increased their confidence in QI (9/11) and led to knowledge acquisition (17/20). Overall, positive learner outcomes (Kirkpatrick Levels 1 to 4A) were demonstrated across a range of curricular content and teaching modalities. In particular, 2 curricula demonstrated positive changes in learners' behavior (Kirkpatrick Level 3), both incorporating a clinical audit or QI project based in hospitals, and supplemented by didactic lectures. Seven curricula were associated with improvements in processes of care (Kirkpatrick Level 4A) all of which were set in a clinical setting and supplemented by didactic lectures and/or small group sessions. None of the curricula evaluated patient benefits (Kirkpatrick Level 4B). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there is heterogeneity in educational content and teaching methods, most curricula are well accepted and led to learners' knowledge acquisition. Although there is limited evidence for the impact of QI curricula on learner behavior and benefit to patients, and for interprofessional QI curricula, teaching QI in the clinical setting leads to better learner outcomes with location being potentially a surrogate for clinical experience. (C) 2020 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 904
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The Action Research Program: Experiential Learning in Systems-Based Practice for First-Year Medical Students
    Ackerman, Sara L.
    Boscardin, Christy
    Karliner, Leah
    Handley, Margaret A.
    Cheng, Sarah
    Gaither, Thomas W.
    Hagey, Jill
    Hennein, Lauren
    Malik, Faizan
    Shaw, Brian
    Trinidad, Norver
    Zahner, Greg
    Gonzales, Ralph
    [J]. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2016, 28 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Student report 2012 national assessment program - literacy and numeracy, V1st, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, TOMORROWS DOCTORS
  • [4] Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians - A systematic review
    Boonyasai, Romsai T.
    Windish, Donna M.
    Chakraborti, Chayan
    Feldman, Leonard S.
    Rubin, Haya R.
    Bass, Eric B.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (09): : 1023 - U39
  • [5] Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning
    Brown, Allison
    Nidumolu, Aditya
    Stanhope, Alexandra
    Koh, Justin
    Greenway, Matthew
    Grierson, Lawrence
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2018, 27 (07) : 576 - 582
  • [6] Promoting research and audit at medical school: evaluating the educational impact of participation in a student-led national collaborative study
    Chapman, Stephen J.
    Glasbey, James C. D.
    Khatri, Chetan
    Kelly, Michael
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Fitzgerald, J. Edward F.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 15
  • [7] How we used a patient visit tracker tool to advance experiential learning in systems-based practice and quality improvement in a medical student clinic
    Chen, Chen
    Park, Ryan J.
    Hegde, John V.
    Jun, Tomi
    Christman, Mitalee P.
    Yoo, Sun M.
    Yamasaki, Alisa
    Berhanu, Aaron
    Vohra-Khullar, Pamela
    Remus, Kristin
    Schwartzstein, Richard M.
    Weinstein, Amy R.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [8] Mainstreaming quality and safety: a reformulation of quality and safety education for health professions students
    Cooke, Molly
    Ironside, Pamela M.
    Ogrinc, Gregory S.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 : I79 - I82
  • [9] Davis S, 2017, INT J MED EDUC, V8, P244, DOI 10.5116/ijme.592a.a936
  • [10] A Fourth-Year Medical School Rotation in Quality, Patient Safety, and Population Medicine
    Dysinger, Wayne S.
    Pappas, James M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (04) : S200 - S205