Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy

被引:738
作者
Dilling, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Lemos, Maria Carmen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Ctr Sci & Technol Policy Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2011年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Science policy; Climate change; Seasonal climate forecasting; USGCRP; Co-production of science and policy; DECISION-MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION; FORECASTS; LESSONS; AGRICULTURE; PREDICTION; RESOURCES; ARIZONA; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the past several decades, decision makers in the United States have increasingly called upon publicly funded science to provide "usable" information for policy making, whether in the case of acid rain, famine prevention or climate change policy. As demands for usability become more prevalent for publicly accountable scientific programs, there is a need to better understand opportunities and constraints to science use in order to inform policy design and implementation. Motivated by recent critique of the decision support function of the US Global Change Research Program, this paper seeks to address this issue by specifically examining the production and use of climate science. It reviews empirical evidence from the rich scholarship focused on climate science use, particularly seasonal climate forecasts, to identify factors that constrain or foster usability. It finds, first, that climate science usability is a function both of the context of potential use and of the process of scientific knowledge production itself. Second, nearly every case of successful use of climate knowledge involved some kind of iteration between knowledge producers and users. The paper argues that, rather than an automatic outcome of the call for the production of usable science, iterativity is the result of the action of specific actors and organizations who 'own' the task of building the conditions and mechanisms fostering its creation. Several different types of institutional arrangements can accomplish this task, depending on the needs and resources available. While not all of the factors that enhance usability of science for decision making are within the realm of the scientific enterprise itself, many do offer opportunities for improvement. Science policy mechanisms such as the level of flexibility afforded to research projects and the metrics used to evaluate the outcomes of research investment can be critical to providing the necessary foundation for iterativity and production of usable science to occur. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 689
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy
    Mayrhofer, Jan P.
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 57 : 22 - 30
  • [32] Climate Change and Public Health Policy: Translating the Science
    Braks, Marieta
    van Ginkel, Rijk
    Wint, William
    Sedda, Luigi
    Sprong, Hein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [33] Urban climate science, planning, policy and investment challenges
    Ruth, Matthias
    Baklanov, Alexander
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2012, 1 : 1 - 3
  • [34] Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications
    Bouabid, Hamid
    Achachi, Hind
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (12) : 6993 - 7013
  • [35] Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications
    Hamid Bouabid
    Hind Achachi
    Scientometrics, 2022, 127 : 6993 - 7013
  • [36] Conceptions of time in (paleo)climate science and some implications
    Caseldine, Chris
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 3 (04) : 329 - 338
  • [37] Learning from failure at the science-policy interface for climate action in agriculture
    Dinesh, Dhanush
    Hegger, Dries
    Vervoort, Joost
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [38] Is There a Case for Recognising Taiwan at the International Science-Policy Interface for Climate Change?
    Mabon, Leslie
    Shih, Wan-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2021, 3
  • [39] Use of dissertation data in science policy research
    Noriyuki Morichika
    Sotaro Shibayama
    Scientometrics, 2016, 108 : 221 - 241
  • [40] Use of dissertation data in science policy research
    Morichika, Noriyuki
    Shibayama, Sotaro
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 108 (01) : 221 - 241