Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy

被引:739
|
作者
Dilling, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Lemos, Maria Carmen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Ctr Sci & Technol Policy Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2011年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Science policy; Climate change; Seasonal climate forecasting; USGCRP; Co-production of science and policy; DECISION-MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION; FORECASTS; LESSONS; AGRICULTURE; PREDICTION; RESOURCES; ARIZONA; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the past several decades, decision makers in the United States have increasingly called upon publicly funded science to provide "usable" information for policy making, whether in the case of acid rain, famine prevention or climate change policy. As demands for usability become more prevalent for publicly accountable scientific programs, there is a need to better understand opportunities and constraints to science use in order to inform policy design and implementation. Motivated by recent critique of the decision support function of the US Global Change Research Program, this paper seeks to address this issue by specifically examining the production and use of climate science. It reviews empirical evidence from the rich scholarship focused on climate science use, particularly seasonal climate forecasts, to identify factors that constrain or foster usability. It finds, first, that climate science usability is a function both of the context of potential use and of the process of scientific knowledge production itself. Second, nearly every case of successful use of climate knowledge involved some kind of iteration between knowledge producers and users. The paper argues that, rather than an automatic outcome of the call for the production of usable science, iterativity is the result of the action of specific actors and organizations who 'own' the task of building the conditions and mechanisms fostering its creation. Several different types of institutional arrangements can accomplish this task, depending on the needs and resources available. While not all of the factors that enhance usability of science for decision making are within the realm of the scientific enterprise itself, many do offer opportunities for improvement. Science policy mechanisms such as the level of flexibility afforded to research projects and the metrics used to evaluate the outcomes of research investment can be critical to providing the necessary foundation for iterativity and production of usable science to occur. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 689
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transforming climate science into usable services: The effectiveness of co-production in promoting uptake of climate information by smallholder farmers in Senegal
    Chiputwa, Brian
    Wainaina, Priscilla
    Nakelse, Tebila
    Makui, Parmutia
    Zougmore, Robert B.
    Ndiaye, Ousmane
    Minang, Peter A.
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2020, 20
  • [22] Partisans and the use of Knowledge versus Science
    Staley, Richard
    BERICHTE ZUR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE, 2019, 42 (2-3) : 220 - 234
  • [23] Knowledge brokers within the multiple streams framework: The science-policy interface for livestock and climate change discussions in Kenya
    Cramer, Laura
    Crane, Todd
    Dewulf, Art
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 147 : 44 - 56
  • [24] Learning from failure at the science–policy interface for climate action in agriculture
    Dhanush Dinesh
    Dries Hegger
    Joost Vervoort
    Bruce M. Campbell
    Peter P. J. Driessen
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2021, 26
  • [25] Climate change effects: the intersection of science, policy, and resource management in the USA
    Scarlett, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 29 (03): : 892 - 903
  • [26] Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science
    Kirchhoff, Christine J.
    Lemos, Maria Carmen
    Dessai, Suraje
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 : 393 - 414
  • [27] An overview of the science-policy interface among climate change, biodiversity, and terrestrial land use for production landscapes
    Thompson, Ian D.
    JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2015, 20 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [28] Exposure science in an age of rapidly changing climate: challenges and opportunities
    Judy S LaKind
    Jonathan Overpeck
    Patrick N Breysse
    Lorrie Backer
    Susan D Richardson
    Jon Sobus
    Amir Sapkota
    Crystal R Upperman
    Chengsheng Jiang
    C Ben Beard
    J M Brunkard
    Jesse E Bell
    Ryan Harris
    Jean-Paul Chretien
    Richard E Peltier
    Ginger L Chew
    Benjamin C Blount
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2016, 26 : 529 - 538
  • [29] The future-climate, current-policy framework: towards an approach linking climate science to sector policy development
    Evans, Barbara E.
    Rowell, David P.
    Semazzi, Frederick H. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [30] Climate Change and Public Health Policy: Translating the Science
    Braks, Marieta
    van Ginkel, Rijk
    Wint, William
    Sedda, Luigi
    Sprong, Hein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 11 (01) : 13 - 29