Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy

被引:735
|
作者
Dilling, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Lemos, Maria Carmen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Ctr Sci & Technol Policy Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2011年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Science policy; Climate change; Seasonal climate forecasting; USGCRP; Co-production of science and policy; DECISION-MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; SCIENTIFIC-INFORMATION; FORECASTS; LESSONS; AGRICULTURE; PREDICTION; RESOURCES; ARIZONA; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the past several decades, decision makers in the United States have increasingly called upon publicly funded science to provide "usable" information for policy making, whether in the case of acid rain, famine prevention or climate change policy. As demands for usability become more prevalent for publicly accountable scientific programs, there is a need to better understand opportunities and constraints to science use in order to inform policy design and implementation. Motivated by recent critique of the decision support function of the US Global Change Research Program, this paper seeks to address this issue by specifically examining the production and use of climate science. It reviews empirical evidence from the rich scholarship focused on climate science use, particularly seasonal climate forecasts, to identify factors that constrain or foster usability. It finds, first, that climate science usability is a function both of the context of potential use and of the process of scientific knowledge production itself. Second, nearly every case of successful use of climate knowledge involved some kind of iteration between knowledge producers and users. The paper argues that, rather than an automatic outcome of the call for the production of usable science, iterativity is the result of the action of specific actors and organizations who 'own' the task of building the conditions and mechanisms fostering its creation. Several different types of institutional arrangements can accomplish this task, depending on the needs and resources available. While not all of the factors that enhance usability of science for decision making are within the realm of the scientific enterprise itself, many do offer opportunities for improvement. Science policy mechanisms such as the level of flexibility afforded to research projects and the metrics used to evaluate the outcomes of research investment can be critical to providing the necessary foundation for iterativity and production of usable science to occur. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 689
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Useful to Usable: Developing usable climate science for agriculture
    Prokopy, Linda Stalker
    Carlton, J. Stuart
    Haigh, Tonya
    Lemos, Maria Carmen
    Mase, Amber Saylor
    Widhalm, Melissa
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 15 : 1 - 7
  • [2] A brief history of usable climate science
    Deborah R. Coen
    Climatic Change, 2021, 167
  • [3] A brief history of usable climate science
    Coen, Deborah R.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 167 (3-4) : 3 - 4
  • [4] How policymakers' demands for usable knowledge shape science-policy relations in environmental policy in Poland
    Kowalczewska, Katarzyna
    Behagel, Jelle
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 46 (03) : 381 - 390
  • [5] Ideology, knowledge, and the assessment of science policy agencies
    Haglin, Kathryn
    Vedlitz, Arnold
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (04) : 707 - 718
  • [6] Science into policy? Discourse, coastal management and knowledge
    Nursey-Bray, Melissa J.
    Vince, Joanna
    Scott, Michael
    Haward, Marcus
    O'Toole, Kevin
    Smith, Tim
    Harvey, Nick
    Clarke, Beverley
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 38 : 107 - 119
  • [7] Creating climate-informed physician leaders: The evolution of a physician fellowship in climate and health science policy
    Wheat, Stefan
    Chekuri, Bhargavi
    Sorensen, Cecilia
    Rochford, Rosemary
    Lemery, Jay
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [8] The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science
    Katzav, Joel
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2014, 46 : 228 - 238
  • [9] Leading with ethics, aiming for policy: new opportunities for philosophy of science
    Nancy Tuana
    Synthese, 2010, 177 : 471 - 492
  • [10] Leading with ethics, aiming for policy: new opportunities for philosophy of science
    Tuana, Nancy
    SYNTHESE, 2010, 177 (03) : 471 - 492