Variability and budget of CO2 in Europe: analysis of the CAATER airborne campaigns - Part 1: Observed variability

被引:14
作者
Xueref-Remy, I. [1 ]
Messager, C. [1 ]
Filippi, D. [2 ]
Pastel, M. [3 ]
Nedelec, P. [4 ]
Ramonet, M. [1 ]
Paris, J. D. [1 ]
Ciais, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] CEA Orme Merisiers, UMR1572, Inst Pierre Simon Lapl, LSCE, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Sextant Technol Ltd, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
[3] Inst Pierre Simon Lapl CNRS UVSQ, Observ Spatiales LATMOS, Atmospheres Lab, F-78280 Guyancourt, France
[4] LA, F-31400 Toulouse, France
关键词
QUANTIFY REGIONAL FLUXES; ATMOSPHERE; TRANSPORT; SENSITIVITY; EMISSIONS; AIRCRAFT; MODELS; LEARN;
D O I
10.5194/acp-11-5655-2011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Atmospheric airborne measurements of CO2 are very well suited for estimating the time-varying distribution of carbon sources and sinks at the regional scale due to the large geographical area covered over a short time. We present here an analysis of two cross-European airborne campaigns carried out on 23-26 May 2001 (CAATER-1) and 2-3 October 2002 (CAATER-2) over Western Europe. The area covered during CAATER-1 and CAATER-2 was 4 degrees W to 14 degrees E long; 44 degrees N to 52 degrees N lat and 1 degrees E to 17 degrees E long; 46 degrees N to 52 degrees N lat respectively. High precision in situ CO2, CO and Radon 222 measurements were recorded. Flask samples were collected during both campaigns to cross-validate the in situ data. During CAATER-1 and CAATER-2, the mean CO2 concentration was 370.1 +/- 4.0 (1-sigma standard deviation) ppm and 371.7 +/- 5.0 (1-sigma) ppm respectively. A HYSPLIT back-trajectories analysis shows that during CAATER 1, northwesterly winds prevailed. In the planetary boundary layer (PBL) air masses became contaminated over Benelux and Western Germany by emissions from these highly urbanized areas, reaching about 380 ppm. Air masses passing over rural areas were depleted in CO2 because of the photosynthesis activity of the vegetation, with observations as low as 355 ppm. During CAATER-2, the back-trajectory analysis showed that air masses were distributed among the 4 sectors. Air masses were enriched in CO2 and CO over anthropogenic emission spots in Germany but also in Poland, as these countries have part of the most CO2-emitting coal-based plants in Europe. Simultaneous measurements of in situ CO2 and CO combined with back-trajectories helped us to distinguish between fossil fuel emissions and other CO2 sources. The Delta CO/Delta CO2 ratios (R-2 = 0.33 to 0.88, slopes = 2.42 to 10.37), calculated for anthropogenic-influenced air masses over different countries/regions matched national inventories quite well, showing that airborne measurements can help to identify the origin of fossil fuel emissions in the PBL even when distanced by several days/hundreds of kms from their sources. We have compared airborne CO2 observations to nearby ground station measurements and thereby, confirmed that measurements taken in the lower few meters of the PBL (low-level ground stations) are representative of the local scale, while those located in the free troposphere (FT) (moutain stations) are representative of atmospheric CO2 regionally on a scale of a few hundred kilometers. Stations located several 100 km away from each other differ from a few ppm in their measurements indicating the existence of a gradient within the free troposphere. Observations at stations located on top of small mountains may match the airborne data if the sampled air comes from the FT rather than coming up from the valley. Finally, the analysis of the CO2 vertical variability conducted on the 14 profiles recorded in each campaign shows a variability at least 5 to 8 times higher in the PBL (the 1-sigma standard deviation associated to the CO2 mean of all profiles within the PBL is 4.0 ppm and 5.7 ppm for CAATER-1 and CAATER-2, respectively) than in the FT (within the FT, 1-sigma is 0.5 ppm and 1.1 ppm for CAATER-1 and CAATER-2, respectively). The CO2 jump between the PBL and the FT equals 3.7 ppm for the first campaign and -0.3 ppm for the second campaign. A very striking zonal CO2 gradient of about 1 ppm was observed in the mid-PBL during CAATER-2, with higher concentrations in the west than in the east. This gradient may originate from differences in atmospheric mixing, ground emission rates or Autumn's earlier start in the west. More airborne campaigns are currently under analysis in the framework of the CARBOEUROPE-IP project to better assess the likelihood of these different hypotheses. In a companion paper (Xueref-Remy et al., 2011, Part 2), a comparison of vertical profiles from observations and several modeling frameworks was conducted for both campaigns.
引用
收藏
页码:5655 / 5672
页数:18
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A 1 degrees x1 degrees distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950-1990 [J].
Andres, RJ ;
Marland, G ;
Fung, I ;
Matthews, E .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1996, 10 (03) :419-429
[2]  
[Anonymous], IPCC CLIM CHANG 2007
[3]   Variational data assimilation for atmospheric CO2 [J].
Baker, David F. ;
Doney, Scott C. ;
Schimel, David S. .
TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2006, 58 (05) :359-365
[4]   What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes - Part 2: Sensitivity of flux accuracy to inverse setup [J].
Carouge, C. ;
Rayner, P. J. ;
Peylin, P. ;
Bousquet, P. ;
Chevallier, F. ;
Ciais, P. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (06) :3119-3129
[5]   What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes - Part 1: Potential of the 2001 network [J].
Carouge, C. ;
Bousquet, P. ;
Peylin, P. ;
Rayner, P. J. ;
Ciais, P. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (06) :3107-3117
[6]  
Draxler RR, 1998, AUST METEOROL MAG, V47, P295
[7]  
*EMEP, 2008, GREENH GAS EM TRENDS, V5
[8]  
FILIPPI D, 2002, 6 INT C CO2 SEND JAP
[9]   Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe -: Part 1:: mapping the atmospheric CO2 signals [J].
Geels, C. ;
Gloor, M. ;
Ciais, P. ;
Bousquet, P. ;
Peylin, P. ;
Vermeulen, A. T. ;
Dargaville, R. ;
Aalto, T. ;
Brandt, J. ;
Christensen, J. H. ;
Frohn, L. M. ;
Haszpra, L. ;
Karstens, U. ;
Roedenbeck, C. ;
Ramonet, M. ;
Carboni, G. ;
Santaguida, R. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2007, 7 (13) :3461-3479
[10]  
Gerbig C, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI [10.1029/2002JD003018, 10.1029/2003JD003018]