A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: A cohort study

被引:55
作者
Dean, Nicola R. [1 ]
Crittenden, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Level 5,Flinders Dr,Bedford Pk, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
BREAST-Q; Clinical effectiveness research; Breast reconstruction; Patient-reported outcomes measures; Comparative effectiveness research; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMMEDIATE; SATISFACTION; MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; MORBIDITY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of breast reconstruction and the utility of the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes measure for routine patient care. Methods: The BREAST-Q was administered to all patients attending a breast reconstructive service (n = 343) at a University Hospital at each visit. Results: The BREAST-Q was easy to administer in a clinic setting, with a high participation rate (64.2% completing the minimum dataset of three BREAST-Qs). Pre-operatively, women with invasive cancer scored lower than those with DCIS or high-risk status (eg. mean psychosocial well-being scores 51.45 vs 63.74 vs 65.56, p < 0.05). At six months post-mound reconstruction the mean values for immediate and delayed timing of reconstruction were similar, with the change in quality of life from pre-reconstruction to this time-point post-reconstruction being greater in the delayed group (eg. mean improvement in psychosocial well-being scores for immediate 8.90 vs delayed 19.87, p < 0.05). Women with autologous flaps had greater improvements than women with implant-based reconstruction (eg. mean increase in psychosocial wellbeing scores 20.29 vs 9.58, p < 0.05). Breast reconstruction was highly effective in terms of improving psychosocial (mean pre-op 55.44 vs post-op 71.47, p < 0.001), physical (mean pre-op 69.82 vs post-op 74.78, p < 0.001), and sexual well-being (mean pre-op 38.74 vs post-op 54.17, p < 0.001), as well as satisfaction with breasts (mean pre-op 44.99 vs postop 64.92, p < 0.001), in this non-selected cohort of patients. Conclusion: Breast reconstruction is highly effective in improving the well-being of women undergoing mastectomy. The BREAST-Q is well suited for clinical effectiveness research and easily incorporated into routine patient care. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1477
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Economic Implications of Recent Trends in U. S. Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction [J].
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) :463-470
[3]   Determinants of patients' choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer [J].
Ananian, P ;
Houvenaeghel, G ;
Protière, C ;
Rouanet, P ;
Arnaud, S ;
Moatti, JP ;
Tallet, A ;
Braud, AC ;
Julian-Reynier, C .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :762-771
[4]   The economic viability of breast reconstruction in the UK: Comparison of a single surgeon's experience of implant; LD; TRAM and DIEP based reconstructions in 274 patients [J].
Atherton, D. D. ;
Hills, A. J. ;
Moradi, P. ;
Muirhead, N. ;
Wood, S. H. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (06) :710-715
[5]   Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction - Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study [J].
Atisha, Dunya ;
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Davis, Jenny ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) :1019-1028
[6]   A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures [J].
Atisha, Dunya M. ;
Rushing, Christel N. ;
Samsa, Gregory P. ;
Locklear, Tracie D. ;
Cox, Charlie E. ;
Hwang, E. Shelley ;
Zenn, Michael R. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) :361-369
[7]   The BREAST-Q: Further Validation in Independent Clinical Samples [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) :293-302
[8]   The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015 [J].
Cohen, Wess A. ;
Mundy, Lily R. ;
Ballard, Tiffany N. S. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Browne, John ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (02) :149-162
[9]  
DEAN C, 1983, LANCET, V1, P459
[10]   Quality-of-Life Outcomes between Mastectomy Alone and Breast Reconstruction: Comparison of Patient-Reported BREAST-Q and Other Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures [J].
Eltahir, Yassir ;
Werners, Lisanne L. C. H. ;
Dreise, Marieke M. ;
van Emmichoven, Ingeborg A. Zeijlmans ;
Jansen, Liesbeth ;
Werker, Paul M. N. ;
de Bock, Geertruida H. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (02) :201E-209E