How Provider Selection and Management Contribute to Successful Innovation Outsourcing: An Empirical Study at Siemens

被引:38
作者
Cui, Zhijian [1 ]
Loch, Christoph [1 ]
Grossmann, Bernd [2 ]
He, Ru [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Siemens AG, Corp Res & Technol, D-81739 Munich, Germany
关键词
innovation outsourcing; collaborative R&D; categorical data; field research; contingency analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; MODEL; FIRM; US; BOUNDARIES; SUPPLIERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01237.x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
It is becoming increasingly common to involve external technology providers in developing new technologies and new products. Two important phases involved in working with technology vendors are vendor selection and vendor management. Because for both steps theory development of key decision guidelines is still immature, we use detailed case studies of 31 innovation outsourcing projects at Siemens to develop grounded theory on provider selection criteria and on project management success drivers. A selection criterion often associated with successful outsourcing is the provider's track record or previous experience. Our cases suggest that there is no standard track record for success but that a match between the client firm's outsourcing motivation and the provider's strengths appears to be a necessary condition for a successful outsourcing collaboration. As to the second phasemanaging the vendorwe identify a number of operational project success drivers. There seems to be no universal checklist, but the most important drivers seem to be contingent on the type of vendor chosen and on the maturity of the technology. We compare five provider typesuniversities, competitors, customers, start-up companies, and component suppliersand find that some success drivers are common to all providers, while others are relevant only for certain types of provider. Moreover, drivers in the case of a mature technology are more focused on successful transfer to manufacturing than on development itself. Our findings offer guidelines for innovation managers on how to select innovation providers and how to manage them during the project.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 48
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 1996, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
  • [2] TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE
    ANDERSON, P
    TUSHMAN, ML
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) : 604 - 633
  • [3] Anderson P., 2001, IND CORP CHANGE, V10, P675, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.3.675
  • [4] [Anonymous], COLLABORATIVE ADV WI
  • [5] Cooperative R&D and firm performance
    Belderbos, R
    Carree, M
    Lokshin, B
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) : 1477 - 1492
  • [6] Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies
    Belderbos, R
    Carree, M
    Diederen, B
    Lokshin, B
    Veugelers, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 22 (8-9) : 1237 - 1263
  • [7] CONFIGURATIONS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN US AND JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS
    BENSAOU, M
    VENKATRAMAN, N
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) : 1471 - 1492
  • [8] Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development
    Bhaskaran, Sreekumar R.
    Krishnan, V.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (07) : 1152 - 1169
  • [9] Branconia CV., 2004, International Journal of Project Management, V22, P119, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00014-0
  • [10] Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?
    Brusoni, S
    Prencipe, A
    Pavitt, K
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 46 (04) : 597 - 621