An analytic network process model for risk quantification of mega construction projects

被引:25
作者
Erol, Huseyin [1 ]
Dikmen, Irem [2 ]
Atasoy, Guzide [2 ]
Birgonul, M. Talat [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Beytepe Campus, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Dumlupinar Bulvari 1, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Risk; Complexity; Uncertainty; Analytic network process; Mega construction projects; Management strategies; LARGE ENGINEERING PROJECTS; COST OVERRUNS; COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIZATION; MEGAPROJECTS; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116215
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Risk, complexity, and uncertainty are inherent components of megaprojects due to their unique features. However, existing project management practices lack a structured synthesis of these concepts, which leads to unrealistic risk assessments, ineffective management strategies, and poor project performance. In order to fill this gap, this research aims to develop a holistic risk quantification approach incorporating risk-related concepts. For this purpose, a conceptual risk assessment process developed for mega construction projects was operationalized with an Analytic Network Process (ANP) model. The weights of the risk sources in the ANP model were determined by the domain experts through a two-round Delphi study. With the purpose of improving the efficiency and reliability of the knowledge elicitation process, the Delphi study was supported by an interactive data collection tool capable of ANP calculations. The resulting model helped to prioritize the risk sources in mega construction projects. The validity of the findings was tested through the data of 11 mega construction projects. Validation studies revealed the potential of the ANP-based model in quantifying the project risks. Hence, the novel approach proposed in this study is expected to contribute both to the literature by unveiling the interactions between risk-related concepts and to the practitioners by assisting them in assessing the project risks more realistically. Although the risk quantification model has been developed for mega construction projects, it can also be implemented in other project-based industries with minor modifications.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks
    Ackermann, Fran
    Howick, Susan
    Quigley, John
    Walls, Lesley
    Houghton, Tom
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 238 (01) : 290 - 299
  • [2] Integrated priority decision index for risk assessment in chaos: cost overruns in transport projects
    Afzal, Farman
    Shao, Yunfei
    Sajid, Muhammad
    Afzal, Fahim
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (04) : 825 - 849
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, A Guide to the SCRUM BODY OF KNOWLEDGE (SBOK TM GUIDE) Third Edition A Comprehensive Guide to Deliver Projects using Scrum Includes two chapters about Scaling Scrum for Large Projects and the Enterprise
  • [4] An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP
    Aull-Hyde, R
    Erdogan, S
    Duke, JM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (01) : 290 - 295
  • [5] Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [6] Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
  • [7] Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects
    Biesenthal, Christopher
    Clegg, Stewart
    Mahalingam, Ashwin
    Sankaran, Shankar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [8] An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects
    Boateng, Prince
    Chen, Zhen
    Ogunlana, Stephen O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (08) : 1795 - 1811
  • [9] Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework
    Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian
    Jongkind, Yuri
    Mooi, Herman
    Bakker, Hans
    Verbraeck, Alexander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (06) : 728 - 739
  • [10] An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Ozturkcan, Demet
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (08) : 5835 - 5847