The Effect of Commercially Available Desensitizers on Bond Strength Following Cementation of Zirconia Crowns Using Self-Adhesive Resin Cement-An In Vitro Study

被引:8
作者
Dewan, Harisha [1 ]
Sayed, Mohammed E. [1 ]
Alqahtani, Nasser M. [2 ]
Alnajai, Tariq [3 ]
Qasir, Abdulaziz [3 ]
Chohan, Hitesh [4 ]
机构
[1] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Khalid Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
[3] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
关键词
cementation; bond strength; dentin-desensitizing agents; tooth preparation; OXIDE CERAMIC CROWNS; DENTIN; RETENTION; AGENTS; SENSITIVITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3390/ma15020514
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The improvement of the tensile strength of zirconia crowns after the application of commercially available desensitizers can provide added advantages for the durability and strength of zirconia prostheses. We assessed the retention of zirconia crowns when Gluma, Shield Force Plus, and Telio CS desensitizers were used with resin luting cement. Four groups with ten specimens each (n = 10) were considered as Group 1 (Control group, with no desensitizer application before crown cementation with resin cement) and Groups 2, 3, and 4 (with a single coat of Gluma dentin desensitizer, Telio CS desensitizer, or Shield Force Plus desensitizer applied before crown cementation, respectively). Thermocycling was then carried out, and each group was tested to determine the associated retentive forces and type of failure. The data were statistically analyzed, which showed that the mean tensile-strength values were significantly higher in Group 2 (p-value = 0.001), Group 3 (p-value = 0.027), and Group 4 (p-value = 0.014), when compared with the Control group. Clinicians should consider the application of any of these three desensitizers, as they can successfully abate dentin hypersensitivity after tooth preparation, as well as increase the durability and strength of the zirconia prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ADDY M, 1990, DENT CLIN N AM, V34, P503
[2]   Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems [J].
Behr, M ;
Rosentritt, M ;
Regnet, T ;
Lang, R ;
Handel, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2004, 20 (02) :191-197
[3]   INHIBITION OF SERUM-ALBUMIN FLUX ACROSS EXPOSED DENTIN FOLLOWING CONDITIONING WITH GLUMA PRIMER, GLUTARALDEHYDE OR POTASSIUM OXALATES [J].
BERGENHOLTZ, G ;
JONTELL, M ;
TUTTLE, A ;
KNUTSSON, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1993, 21 (04) :220-227
[4]  
Chandavarkar Saili M, 2015, Contemp Clin Dent, V6, pS45, DOI 10.4103/0976-237X.152937
[5]  
Dondi dall'Orologio G, 1993, Am J Dent, V6, P283
[6]   The efficacy of three desensitizing agents used to treat dentin hypersensitivity [J].
Erdemir, Ugur ;
Yildiz, Esra ;
Kilic, Imren ;
Yucel, Taner ;
Ozel, Sevda .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 141 (03) :285-296
[7]   In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents [J].
Ernst, CP ;
Doz, P ;
Cohnen, U ;
Stender, E ;
Willershausen, B .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 93 (06) :551-558
[8]  
FELTON D A, 1991, International Journal of Prosthodontics, V4, P292
[9]   Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations [J].
Gale, MS ;
Darvell, BW .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (02) :89-99
[10]   Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents [J].
Heintze, S. D. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (03) :193-206