Assurance of surgical quality within multicenter randomized controlled trials for bariatric and metabolic surgery: a systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Wiggins, Tom [1 ]
Jamel, Sara [1 ]
Hakky, Sherif [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed [1 ]
Markar, Sheraz R. [1 ]
Hanna, George B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
Y GASTRIC BYPASS; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; BODY-MASS INDEX; OBESE-PATIENTS; INTERNAL HERNIA; MORBID-OBESITY; WEIGHT-LOSS; OPEN-LABEL; INTERVENTION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2021.08.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical quality assurance methods aim to ensure standardization and high quality of surgical techniques within multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thereby diminishing the heterogeneity of surgery and reducing biases due to surgical variation. This study aimed to establish the measures undertaken to ensure surgical quality within multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery, and their influence upon clinical outcomes. Methods: An electronic literature search was performed from the Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases to identify multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery. Each RCT was evaluated against a checklist of surgical quality measures within 3 domain: (1) standardization of surgical techniques; (2) credentialing of surgical experience; and (3) monitoring of performance. Outcome measures were postoperative weight change and complications. Results: Nineteen multicenter RCTs were included in the analysis. Three studies undertook pretrial education of surgical standard. Fourteen studies described complete standardization of surgical techniques. Four studies credentialed surgeons by case volume prior to enrollment. Two studies used intraoperative or video evaluation of surgical technique prior to enrollment. Only two studies monitored performance during the study. Although there were limited quality assurance methods undertaken, utilization of these techniques was associated with reduced overall complications. Standardization of surgery was associated with reduced re-operation rates but did not influence postoperative weight loss. Conclusion: The utilization of methods for surgical quality assurance are very limited within multicenter RCTs of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Future studies must implement surgical quality assurance methods to reduce variability of surgical performance and potential bias within RCTs. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bariatric Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 132
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of omentectomy added to bariatric surgery on metabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Yung
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Major, Piotr
    Brar, Karanbir
    Doumouras, Aristithes G.
    Hong, Dennis
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (11) : 1766 - 1782
  • [2] Seventy years of bariatric surgery: A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials
    Rives-Lange, Claire
    Rassy, Natalie
    Carette, Claire
    Phan, Aurelie
    Barsamian, Charles
    Thereaux, Jeremie
    Moszkowicz, David
    Poghosyan, Tigran
    Czernichow, Sebastien
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2022, 23 (05)
  • [3] Effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kang, Jenny H.
    Le, Quang A.
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (46)
  • [4] Expert-based physical activity guidelines for metabolic and bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Fernandez-Alonso, Melissa
    Bejarano, Geronimo
    Creel, David B.
    Kohl, Harold W.
    Messiah, Sarah E.
    Altieri, Maria S.
    Papasavas, Pavlos
    Horn, Carah
    Marroquin, Elisa
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2025, 21 (05) : 606 - 614
  • [5] Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force
    Brethauer, Stacy A.
    Kothari, Shanu
    Sudan, Ranjan
    Williams, Brandon
    English, Wayne J.
    Brengman, Matthew
    Kurian, Marina
    Hutter, Matthew
    Stegemann, Lloyd
    Kallies, Kara
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    Ponce, Jaime
    Morton, John M.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2014, 10 (05) : 952 - 972
  • [6] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with other bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review of randomized trials
    Trastulli, Stefano
    Desiderio, Jacopo
    Guarino, Salvatore
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Scalercio, Vittorio
    Noya, Giuseppe
    Parisi, Amilcare
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2013, 9 (05) : 816 - 829
  • [7] Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery is Safe and Effective in People with Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cohen, Ricardo V.
    Azevedo, Mauricio A.
    Le Roux, Carel W.
    Caldeon, Lorraine P. M. L. P.
    Luque, Alexandre
    Fayad, Dhiego A.
    Petry, Tarissa B. Z.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (11) : 4097 - 4105
  • [8] Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients with Situs Inversus: a Systematic Review
    Sakran, Nasser
    Stier, Christine
    Parmar, Chetan
    Pouwels, Sjaak
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (11) : 3628 - 3635
  • [9] Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Germany 2012-Results of the Quality Assurance Study on Surgery for Obesity (Data of the German Bariatric Surgery Registry)
    Stroh, C.
    Weiner, R.
    Benedix, F.
    Horbach, T.
    Birk, D.
    Luderer, D.
    Ludwig, K.
    Meyer, G.
    Wilhelm, B.
    Wolff, S.
    Knoll, C.
    Manger, T.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2014, 139 (02): : E1 - E5
  • [10] Liver transplantation and bariatric surgery: a new surgical reality: a systematic review of the best time for bariatric surgery
    de Barros, Fernando
    Cardoso Faleiro Uba, Pedro Henrique
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (05) : 1615 - 1622