Assessing clinical reasoning in airway related cases among anesthesiology fellow residents using Script Concordance Test (SCT)

被引:4
作者
Omega, Andy [1 ]
Ramlan, Andi Ade Wijaya [1 ]
Soenarto, Ratna Farida [1 ]
Heriwardito, Aldy [1 ]
Sugiarto, Adhrie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, DKI Jakarta,Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
来源
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE | 2022年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
Script concordance test; clinical reasoning; anesthesiology residents; airway management; evaluation test; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; UNDERGRADUATE; UNCERTAINTY; EDUCATION; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/10872981.2022.2135421
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction Clinical reasoning is a core competency for physicians. In the field of anesthesia, many situations require residents to use their clinical reasoning to make quick and appropriate decisions such as during emergency airway cases. The Script Concordance Test (SCT) is a test developed in recent years and validated that objectively assess clinical reasoning ability. However, studies involving SCT to assess clinical reasoning in airway management is scarce. Aim To evaluate SCT in assessing clinical reasoning for airway management in anesthesiology residents. Method A cross-sectional study involving residents and anesthesiology consultants from the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was conducted to complete SCT. A panel of five anesthesiology consultants with more than 15 years of work experience constructed 20 SCT vignettes based on prevalent airway cases in our center from the past 10 years. Each SCT has three nested questions, with a total of 60 questions, to be answered within 120 min. Results The SCT of 20 case vignettes with three nested questions were tested on 99 residents from the junior, intermediate, and senior residents, compared to answers from the expert group consisting of ten anesthesiology consultants with more than 5 years of experience. There were significant differences in mean SCT scores in the junior, intermediate, senior and expert groups, 59.3 (46.1-72.8), 64.7 (39.9-74.9), 67.5 (50.6-78.3), and 79.6 (78.4-84.8); p < 0,001 consecutively. Cronbach Alpha 0.69 was obtained, indicating good reliability. Conclusion Our SCT was proven to be a valid and reliable test instrument to assess the clinical reasoning in airway management for anesthesiology residents. SCT was able to discriminate between groups of different clinical experiences and should be included to evaluate airway competencies in anesthesiology residents.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Constructing a question bank based on script concordance approach as a novel assessment methodology in surgical education
    Aldekhayel, Salah A.
    ALselaim, Nahar A.
    Magzoub, Mohi Eldin
    AL-Qattan, Mohammad M.
    Al-Namlah, Abdullah M.
    Tamim, Hani
    Al-Khayal, Abdullah
    Al-Habdan, Sultan I.
    Zamakhshary, Mohammed F.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 12
  • [2] Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students
    Amey, Lisa
    Donald, Kenneth J.
    Teodorczuk, Andrew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (07) : 399 - 401
  • [3] Cooke S, 2016, CREATIVE ED, V7, P814, DOI DOI 10.4236/CE.2016.76084
  • [4] How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review
    Dory, Valerie
    Gagnon, Robert
    Vanpee, Dominique
    Charlin, Bernard
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (06) : 552 - 563
  • [5] Assessing clinical reasoning in anesthesiology: Making the case for the Script Concordance Test
    Drolet, Pierre
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [6] Dubois JM., 2006, CURR DEV TECH ASSIS, P1143
  • [7] The Script Concordance Test in anesthesiology: Validation of a new tool for assessing clinical reasoning
    Ducos, Guillaume
    Lejus, Corinne
    Sztark, Francois
    Nathan, Nathalie
    Fourcade, Olivier
    Tack, Ivan
    Asehnoune, Karim
    Kurrek, Matthias
    Charlin, Bernard
    Minville, Vincent
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [8] Script concordance tests: Guidelines for construction
    Fournier, Jean Paul
    Demeester, Anne
    Charlin, Bernard
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [9] Assessment in the context of uncertainty:: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test?
    Gagnon, R
    Charlin, B
    Coletti, M
    Sauvé, E
    van der Vleuten, C
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [10] Education and training in airway management
    Goldmann, Kai
    Ferson, David Z.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 717 - 732