Food and Drug Administration regulation of orthotic cranioplasty

被引:0
作者
Littlefield, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranial Technol, Res & Dev, Phoenix, AZ 85006 USA
关键词
cranial othosis; FDA; federal regulations; Food and Drug Administration;
D O I
10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0337:FADARO>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To present information regarding the current federal regulation of cranial orthotics used for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly as well as to discuss concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration regarding the safety and effectiveness of these devices. Background: Although first introduced in 1979, the use of orthotic helmets for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly was slow to gain acceptance. However, with the recent increase in infants presenting with this condition, numerous orthotic treatment programs have been established throughout the country. Until recently, federal regulation of this "industry" was largely ignored. Regulation: In 1995 our office was served notice that our orthosis would require clearance from the FDA, Since the FDA had never approved a medical device of this kind, clearance presented a significant challenge. However, after 3 years of providing clinical data, clearance was finally granted, and a new device category known generically as "cranial orthosis" was created. A cranial orthosis is considered to be a Class II neurology device and requires both general and special controls in order to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Summary: Orthotics used for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly are regulated by the FDA and are considered Class II neurology devices. Submission of a premarket notification (510[k]) is required prior to placing these devices on the market.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 340
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Analysis of Foot and Ankle Device Recalls by the Food and Drug Administration
    Pellerin, Carl
    Panchbhavi, Vinod
    Janney, Cory F.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (08):
  • [42] Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approvals of Biological Drugs in 2023
    Martins, Alexander C.
    Oshiro, Mariana Y.
    Albericio, Fernando
    de la Torre, Beatriz G.
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [43] A History of Biopharmaceutics in the Food and Drug Administration 1968-1993
    Skelly, Jerome Philip
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [44] Demystifying the US Food and Drug Administration: Understanding Regulatory Pathways
    Naghshineh, Nima
    Brown, Spencer
    Cederna, Paul S.
    Levi, Benjamin
    Lisiecki, Jeffrey
    D'Amico, Richard A.
    Hume, Keith M.
    Seward, William
    Rubin, J. Peter
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (03) : 559 - 569
  • [45] A review of new drugs approved by the food and drug administration in 2022
    Swaminathan, Arjun
    Vijayakumar, A. E.
    Nikhithaa, P.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 12 (10) : 2223 - 2229
  • [46] Understanding Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Requirements for an Investigational Device Exemption for Sponsor-Investigators
    Holbein, M. E. Blair
    Berglund, Jelena Petrovic
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (07) : 987 - 994
  • [47] Sam Greenhouse: his contributions as a consultant to the Food and Drug Administration
    O'Neill, RT
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (21) : 3285 - 3289
  • [48] Overview of the US Food and Drug Administration's Reform Legislation
    Rheinstein, PH
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 20 : C4 - C11
  • [49] Anti-Obesity Agents and the US Food and Drug Administration
    Martin F. Casey
    Jeffrey I. Mechanick
    Current Obesity Reports, 2014, 3 (3) : 361 - 367
  • [50] Anti-Obesity Agents and the US Food and Drug Administration
    Casey, Martin F.
    Mechanick, Jeffrey I.
    CURRENT OBESITY REPORTS, 2014, 3 (03): : 361 - 367