Food and Drug Administration regulation of orthotic cranioplasty

被引:0
作者
Littlefield, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranial Technol, Res & Dev, Phoenix, AZ 85006 USA
关键词
cranial othosis; FDA; federal regulations; Food and Drug Administration;
D O I
10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0337:FADARO>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To present information regarding the current federal regulation of cranial orthotics used for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly as well as to discuss concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration regarding the safety and effectiveness of these devices. Background: Although first introduced in 1979, the use of orthotic helmets for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly was slow to gain acceptance. However, with the recent increase in infants presenting with this condition, numerous orthotic treatment programs have been established throughout the country. Until recently, federal regulation of this "industry" was largely ignored. Regulation: In 1995 our office was served notice that our orthosis would require clearance from the FDA, Since the FDA had never approved a medical device of this kind, clearance presented a significant challenge. However, after 3 years of providing clinical data, clearance was finally granted, and a new device category known generically as "cranial orthosis" was created. A cranial orthosis is considered to be a Class II neurology device and requires both general and special controls in order to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Summary: Orthotics used for the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly are regulated by the FDA and are considered Class II neurology devices. Submission of a premarket notification (510[k]) is required prior to placing these devices on the market.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 340
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk management of drug products and the US Food and Drug Administration: Evolution and context
    Leiderman, Deborah B.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2009, 105 : S9 - S13
  • [32] The Role of the Food and Drug Administration in Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation During the Drug Development Process
    Jennifer Kim
    Carolyn Blank Morris
    Kevin Alan Schulman
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2000, 34 (4): : 1207 - 1213
  • [33] Estimating the Impact of Food and Drug Administration’s Unapproved Drug Initiative on Drug Prices and Sales
    Dolly Sharma
    Glen T. Schumock
    Christopher D. Saffore
    S. Albert Edwards
    Surrey M. Walton
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020, 54 : 424 - 430
  • [34] The future of Food and Drug Administration regulation on artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices: an orthopedic surgeon's guide
    Rana, S. Shamtej Singh
    Ghahremani, Jacob S.
    Navarro, Ronald A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (01) : 260 - 264
  • [35] Estimating the Impact of Food and Drug Administration's Unapproved Drug Initiative on Drug Prices and Sales
    Sharma, Dolly
    Schumock, Glen T.
    Saffore, Christopher D.
    Edwards, S.
    Walton, Surrey M.
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (02) : 424 - 430
  • [36] Biomarker qualification pilot process at the US Food and Drug Administration
    Federico Goodsaid
    Felix Frueh
    The AAPS Journal, 9
  • [37] Biomarker qualification pilot process at the US food and drug administration
    Goodsaid, Federico
    Frueh, Felix
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2007, 9 (01) : E105 - E108
  • [38] Some food and drug administration perspectives of fat and fatty acids
    Scarbrough, FE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1997, 65 (05) : 1578 - 1580
  • [40] Tanning lamps: Health effects and reclassification by the Food and Drug Administration
    Ernst, Alexander
    Grimm, Amanda
    Lim, Henry W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 72 (01) : 175 - 180