Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test

被引:8
|
作者
Saunders, Muriel D. [1 ]
Saunders, Richard R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Life Span Inst, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Adaptive switches; Individuals with multiple profound impairments; Reinforcer preference testing; Reinforcer testing; Synchronous contingencies; PROFOUND MULTIPLE DISABILITIES; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; SWITCH USE; INDIVIDUALS; PEOPLE; IMPAIRMENTS; MOVEMENT; STUDENTS; INFANTS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.049
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
In this study, we continued evaluation of a two-choice preference assessment aimed at identifying a hierarchy of reinforcers for individuals with only one voluntary motor sequence closing and releasing an adaptive switch. We assessed preferences among types of sensory stimulation in 6 adults with multiple profound impairments using concurrent synchronous reinforcement contingencies. Pre-experimental assessments with various types of stimulation led to the selection of music (A), vibration (B), and either olfactory or visual stimulation (C) as the 3 modalities for continued testing. Each participant received opportunities for familiarization with each type of stimulation in blocks of six 20-min sessions in which the closure of an adaptive switch produced the stimulation for as long as the switch remained closed. Next, participants could choose between pairs of types of stimulation in blocks of 12 sessions. In the first 6 of the 12 sessions, switch closure activated one type (e.g., A) and switch release activated the contrasted type (e.g., B). In the second 6 sessions, the contingencies were reversed. Two additional 12-session blocks completed all possible contrasts (AB, BC and AC). Four of the 6 participants showed distinct preferences in these two-choice tests with indications of preference hierarchies. The results demonstrate a method for obtaining indications of relative preference for potentially reinforcing stimuli from individuals without communication and without the abilities to act on more than one switch. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1579
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice
    Hanratty, Laura A.
    Hanley, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2021, 54 (03) : 1062 - 1074
  • [2] Every reinforcer counts: Reinforcer magnitude and local preference
    Davison, M
    Baum, WM
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2003, 80 (01) : 95 - 129
  • [3] The role of context in the evaluation of reinforcer efficacy: Implications for the preference assessment outcomes
    Mangum, Aphrodite
    Fredrick, Laura
    Pabico, Robert
    Roane, Henry
    RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, 2012, 6 (01) : 158 - 167
  • [4] Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs
    Vicars, Sara M.
    Miguel, Caio F.
    Sobie, Jennifer L.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2014, 103 : 75 - 83
  • [5] Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules
    Ward-Horner, John C.
    Pittenger, Alexis
    Pace, Gary
    Fienup, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2014, 47 (03) : 623 - 627
  • [6] Local preference in concurrent schedules: The effects of reinforcer sequences
    Krageloh, CU
    Davison, M
    Elliffe, DM
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2005, 84 (01) : 37 - 64
  • [7] On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation
    Davison, Michael
    Cowie, Sarah
    Elliffe, Douglas
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2013, 95 : 100 - 112
  • [8] Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques
    Martin, Allison L.
    Franklin, Andrea N.
    Perlman, Jaine E.
    Bloomsmith, Mollie A.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2018, 157 : 445 - 452
  • [9] CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SINGLE VERSUS DAILY PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND REINFORCER EFFICACY UNDER PROGRESSIVE-RATIO SCHEDULES
    Call, Nathan A.
    Trosclair-Lasserre, Nicole M.
    Findley, Addie J.
    Reavis, Andrea R.
    Shillingsburg, M. Alice
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2012, 45 (04) : 763 - 777
  • [10] Evaluating pictorial preference assessment: The effect of differential outcomes on preference assessment results
    Groskreutz, Mark P.
    Graff, Richard B.
    RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, 2009, 3 (01) : 113 - 128