In situ bioreactors and deep drain-pipe installation to reduce nitrate losses in artificially drained fields

被引:112
作者
Jaynes, Dan B. [1 ]
Kaspar, Tom C. [1 ]
Moorman, Tom B. [1 ]
Parkin, Tim B. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2007.0279
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nitrate in water removed from fields by subsurface drain ('tile') systems is often at concentrations exceeding the 10 mg N L-1 maximum contaminant level (MCL) set by the USEPA for drinking water and has been implicated in contributing to the hypoxia problem within the northern Gulf of Mexico. Because previous research shows that N fertilizer management alone is not sufficient for reducing NO3 concentrations in subsurface drainage below the MCL, additional approaches are needed. In this field study, we compared the NO3 losses in tile drainage from a conventional drainage system (CN) consisting of a free-flowing pipe installed 1.2 m below the soil surface to losses in tile drainage from two alternative drainage designs. The alternative treatments were a deep tile (DT), where the tile drain was installed 0.6 m deeper than the conventional tile depth, but with the outlet maintained at 1.2 m, and a denitrification wall (DW), where trenches excavated parallel to the tile and filled with woodchips serve as additional carbon sources to increase denitrification. Four replicate 30.5- by 42.7-m field plots were installed for each treatment in 1999 and a corn-soybean rotation initiated in 2000. Over 5 yr (20012005) the tile flow from the DW treatment had annual average NO3 concentrations significantly lower than the CN treatment (8.8 vs. 22.1 mg N L-1). This represented an annual reduction in NO3 mass loss of 29 kg N ha(-1) or a 55% reduction in nitrate mass lost in tile drainage for the DW treatment. The DT treatment did not consistently lower NO3 concentrations, not reduce the annual NO3 mass loss in drainage. The DT treatment did exhibit lower NO3 concentrations in tile drainage than the CN treatment during late summer when tile flow rates were minimal. There was no difference in crop yields for any of the treatments. Thus, denitrification walls are able to substantially reduce NO3 concentrations in tiled drainage for at least 5 yr.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OHIO STATE U EXT B
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
BAKER DB, 1988, EPA905488001
[4]  
Baker J. L., 1989, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, V5, P334
[5]   NITRATE, PHOSPHORUS, AND SULFATE IN SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE WATER [J].
BAKER, JL ;
CAMPBELL, KL ;
JOHNSON, HP ;
HANWAY, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1975, 4 (03) :406-412
[6]   NITRATE-NITROGEN IN TILE DRAINAGE AS AFFECTED BY FERTILIZATION [J].
BAKER, JL ;
JOHNSON, HP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1981, 10 (04) :519-522
[7]   EFFECT OF AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT OF WET SLOPING SOIL ON NITRATE AND PHOSPHORUS IN SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE WATER [J].
BENOIT, GR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1973, 9 (05) :1296-1303
[8]   NITRATE LEACHING AND DRAINAGE FROM ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL CROPS IN TILE-DRAINED PLOTS AND LYSIMETERS [J].
BERGSTROM, L .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1987, 16 (01) :11-18
[9]   REMOVAL OF AGRICULTURAL NITRATE FROM TILE-DRAINAGE EFFLUENT WATER USING IN-LINE BIOREACTORS [J].
BLOWES, DW ;
ROBERTSON, WD ;
PTACEK, CJ ;
MERKLEY, C .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1994, 15 (03) :207-221
[10]  
Calvert D.V., 1971, SOIL CROP SCI SOC FL, V31, P229