Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection: A Survey

被引:202
作者
Su, Hongjun [1 ]
Wu, Zhaoyue [2 ]
Zhang, Huihui [1 ]
Du, Qian [3 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Sch Earth Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Extremadura, Dept Technol Comp & Commun, E-10071 Caceres, Spain
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anomaly detection; Hyperspectral imaging; Principal component analysis; Testing; Kernel; Real-time systems; Dictionaries; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; LOW-RANK; COLLABORATIVE REPRESENTATION; TARGET DETECTION; SPARSE-REPRESENTATION; DETECTION ALGORITHMS; SUBSPACE MODEL; NEURAL-NETWORK; RX-ALGORITHM; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1109/MGRS.2021.3105440
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Hyperspectral imagery can obtain hundreds of narrow spectral bands of ground objects. The abundant and detailed spectral information offers a unique diagnostic identification ability for targets of interest. Hyperspectral anomaly detection aims to find targets without prior knowledge, which has attracted attention as a branch of target location. In this article, current hyperspectral anomaly detection methods, anomaly detection performance evaluation techniques, and hyperspectral anomaly detection data sets are widely investigated. Among them, hyperspectral anomaly detection methods can be classified into seven categories: statistic-based, distance-based, reconstruction-based, subspace-based, spatial-spectral-based, deep learning-based, and real-time anomaly detection. The performance of different types of detection methods is also verified with three real hyperspectral data sets. Finally, conclusions about hyperspectral anomaly detection are summarized, and challenges for future research are discussed. © 2013 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 90
页数:27
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]   Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertain [J].
Adams, NM ;
Hand, DJ .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (07) :1139-1147
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Pattern Classification
[3]   A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery [J].
Banerjee, Amit ;
Burlina, Philippe ;
Diehl, Chris .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (08) :2282-2291
[4]   Anomaly detection using topology [J].
Basener, Bill ;
Ientilucci, Emmett J. ;
Messinger, David W. .
ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XIII, 2007, 6565
[5]   Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Method Based on Auto-encoder [J].
Bati, Emrecan ;
Caliskan, Akin ;
Koz, Alper ;
Alatan, A. Aydin .
IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XXI, 2015, 9643
[6]   Robust Principal Component Analysis? [J].
Candes, Emmanuel J. ;
Li, Xiaodong ;
Ma, Yi ;
Wright, John .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2011, 58 (03)
[7]   A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery [J].
Carlotto, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 43 (02) :374-387
[8]   Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chang, CI ;
Chiang, SS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (06) :1314-1325
[9]   A Subspace Selection-Based Discriminative Forest Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection [J].
Chang, Shizhen ;
Du, Bo ;
Zhang, Liangpei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 58 (06) :4033-4046
[10]   BASO: A Background-Anomaly Component Projection and Separation Optimized Filter for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images [J].
Chang, Shizhen ;
Du, Bo ;
Zhang, Liangpei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 56 (07) :3747-3761