Sustainable development assessment from a capitals perspective: Analytical structure and indicator selection criteria

被引:46
作者
da Silva, Juvancir [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Valdir [3 ]
Limont, Marcelo [1 ]
Rauen, William Bonino [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Posit, Grad Programme Environm Management, R Prof Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza 5300, BR-81280330 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Ponta Grossa, Dept Business Management, Praca Santos Andrade 01, BR-84010919 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Grad Programme Urban Environm Sustainabil, Av Sete Setembro 3165, BR-80230901 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Hydraul & Sanitat, Av Cel Francisco H dos Santos 210, BR-81130001 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Sustainable development capitals; Indicator system; Selection criteria; Analytical structure; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INFRASTRUCTURE; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORK; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110147
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable development assessment has been conducted considering its various dimensions, such as environmental, social, cultural and economic. In this paper, the representation of such dimensions is undertaken from the perspective of the natural, social and built capitals. These dimensions are usually represented by indicators, indexes and systems of indicators, but their abundance in the technical and scientific literatures without adequate analytical structures can impair assessment quality and speed. This study aimed to propose a structure for sustainable development assessment whereby key aspects and indicators can be identified, prioritised and meaningfully used from the perspective of sustainable development capitals. Content analysis of selected international papers and technical reports was undertaken to identify relevant analysis elements and their hierarchical order. This has led to a four-tier framework composed of three capitals, seven categories, 19 subcategories and 52 attributes, each of which can be measured with the aid of one or more locally relevant indicator(s) in the context of sustainable development assessment. Selection criteria for such indicators were compiled from the literature and are presented in terms of their political, management, data quality and economic relevance. This study may contribute to the development and refinement of structured sustainable development indicator systems with less analytical ambiguity, overlapping and gaps, and hence improve the representativeness of future assessment efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
ALTWEGG D., 2004, Monitoring Sustainable Development MONET. Final Report-Methods and Results
[2]   Human development and economic sustainability [J].
Anand, S ;
Sen, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (12) :2029-2049
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications: A Report to the Balaton Group
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]  
[Anonymous], WORLD COMM ENV DEV
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ALP CONV SUST RUR DE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Indicadores de desenvolvimento sustentavel