Life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete on its environmental impacts: A critical review

被引:104
作者
Xing, Weiqi
Tam, Vivian W. Y. [1 ]
Le, Khoa N.
Hao, Jian Li
Wang, Jun
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Engn Design & Built Environm, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Environmental impact; Green product; Recycling; Life cycle analysis; Climate change; Recycled aggregate concrete; Sustainable material; REPLACING NATURAL AGGREGATE; ASSESSMENT LCA; FLY-ASH; HIGH-VOLUME; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; BUILDING-MATERIALS; PARTICLE PACKING; EMBODIED ENERGY; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125950
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is expected to a sustainable solution to alter the virgin aggregate concrete (VAC) in structural use. While it is able to address environmental issues for both virgin aggregate (VA) consumption and waste generation, not so many studies quantify the environmental burdens through life cycle assessment (LCA). RAC is a composite material, which LCA should be analysed by considering its mixtures, and corresponding production technologies. This aggravates the complexity of LCA model since it involves great numbers of unit processes. Through reviewing 90 articles, this paper overviews the developments of LCA for RAC, and identifies the research trend shifts with the promotion of RAC technology. Although many relevant studies have become more comprehensive, there are still numerous inconsistencies and uncertainties existing in LCA processes that avoid LCA results from comparisons. From the review, it clearly points out that results are greatly affected by two aspects that are mix design and LCA mechanism. Cement production has the predominant contribution to the environmental impacts of concrete, and normally followed by transportation process. Accordingly, mix design, together with treatment technology of raw materials, influence the overall environmental performance of concrete. With respect to LCA phases, selections of FU, system boundary, allocation rule, LCI and LCIA methodology are highly subjective, causing more uncertainties that hinder the comparisons across the studies. It is therefore suggested that variations of mix design and inconsistencies from LCA mechanism could be explored further in the field of RAC to establish the holistic and multi-criteria study for comparison and decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Aghayan I., INTERNAT J PAVEMENT, V14, P2021
  • [2] Batikha. M., 2020, ADV SCI ENG TECHNOLO
  • [3] Concrete based on recycled aggregates - Recycling and environmental analysis: A case study of paris' region
    Ben Fraj, Amor
    Idir, Rachida
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 157 : 952 - 964
  • [4] Bergman. T.L., 2015, INTEGRATING SERVICE
  • [5] Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA
    Björklund, AE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (02) : 64 - 72
  • [6] Use of recycled aggregates for low carbon and cost effective concrete construction
    Bostanci, Sevket Can
    Limbachiya, Mukesh
    Kew, Hsein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 176 - 196
  • [7] Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates
    Braga, Ana Margarida
    Silvestre, Jose Dinis
    de Brito, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 : 529 - 543
  • [8] Braunschweig A., 2011, LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMEN
  • [9] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Rincon, Lidia
    Vilarino, Virginia
    Perez, Gabriel
    Castell, Albert
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 394 - 416
  • [10] Parametric study of functionally graded concretes incorporating steel fibres and recycled aggregates
    Chan, Ricardo
    Liu, Xingzi
    Galobardes, Isaac
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 242