On the physical significance of the Effective Independence method for sensor for sensor placement

被引:10
作者
Jiang, Yaoguang [1 ]
Li, Dongsheng [1 ]
Song, Gangbing [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, Peoples R China
来源
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES | 2017年 / 842卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Effective Independence method; Fisher information matrix; sensor placement method; structural health monitoring; QR decomposition;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/842/1/012030
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Optimally deploy sparse sensors for better damage identification and structural health monitoring is always a challenging task. The Effective Independence(EI) is one of the most influential sensor placement method and to be discussed in the paper. Specifically, the effect of the different weighting coefficients on the maximization of the Fisher information matrix(FIM) and the physical significance of the re-orthogonalization of modal shapes through QR decomposition in the EI method are addressed. By analyzing the widely used EI method, we found that the absolute identification space put forward along with the EI method is preferable to ensuring the maximization of the FIM, instead of the original EI coefficient which was post-multiolied by a weighting matrix. That is, deleting the row with the minimum EI coefficient can't achieve the objective of maximizing the trace of FIM as initially conceived. Furthermore, we observed that in the computation of EI method, the sum of each retained row in the absolute identification space is a constant in each iteration. This potential property can be revealed distinctively by the product of target mode and its transpose, and its form is similar to an alternative formula of the EI method through orthogonal-triangular(QR) decomposition previously proposed by the authors. With it, the physical significance of re-orthogonalization of modal shapes through QR decomposition in the computation of EI method can be obviously manifested from a new perspective. Finally, two simple examples are provided to demonstrate the above two observations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Matrix Analysis
[2]  
Balageas D., 2006, Structural Health Monitoring
[3]  
Coote J E, 2005, P 24 INT MOD AN C OR, P07
[4]  
Deraemaeker K, 2010, NEW TRENDS VIBRATION
[5]   Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms [J].
Guo, HY ;
Zhang, L ;
Zhang, LL ;
Zhou, JX .
SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2004, 13 (03) :528-534
[6]   Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge [J].
Heo, G ;
Wang, ML ;
Satpathi, D .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 1997, 16 (7-8) :495-502
[7]   SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR ON-ORBIT MODAL IDENTIFICATION AND CORRELATION OF LARGE SPACE STRUCTURES [J].
KAMMER, DC .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1991, 14 (02) :251-259
[8]   Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests [J].
Kammer, DC ;
Tinker, ML .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2004, 18 (01) :29-41
[9]   The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement [J].
Li, D. S. ;
Li, H. N. ;
Fritzen, C. P. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2007, 305 (4-5) :945-955
[10]   A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement [J].
Li, Dong-Sheng ;
Li, Hong-Nan ;
Fritzen, Claus-Peter .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 23 (04) :1160-1168