Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey

被引:24
作者
Oka, Rena [1 ,2 ]
Ohira, Masahiro [2 ]
Suzuki, Sawako [3 ]
Yoshida, Tomohiko [4 ]
Koide, Hisashi [3 ]
Tanaka, Tomoaki [3 ]
Tatsuno, Ichiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diabet Endocrine & Metab, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Toho Univ, Sakura Hosp, Ctr Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 2850841, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Clin Cell Biol & Med, Chiba, Japan
[4] Chiba Aoba Municipal Hosp, Dept Med, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Osteoporosis; Bone mineral density; Fracture risk assessment tool; Major osteoporotic fracture risk; Hip fracture risk; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0331
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis not only increases bone fracture risk but also affects survival in postmenopausal women. Although osteoporosis is diagnosed based on low bone mineral density (BMD) determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), BMD measurement is sometimes difficult because DXA is not widely available in the community. The Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX) can predict 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk and hip fracture risk with or without femoral neck BMD. The FRAX has not been investigated adequately in community-dwelling Japanese women. We administered the FRAX tool in 13,421 Japanese women who underwent DXA-based forearm BMD measurement in Chiba Bone Survey, a population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study of postmenopausal osteoporosis conducted in Chiba, Japan. Mean age was 57.77 +/- 9.24 years. Mean forearm BMD was 87.94 +/- 17.00% of young adult mean (YAM). Mean FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without femoral neck BMD was 7.06 +/- 5.22%. BMD decreased and percentage of osteoporosis increased from age 55 onward. Age distribution of percentage of subjects with FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk >15% was similar to that of percentage of osteoporosis subjects. We identified the cutoff value of FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk for diagnosis of osteoporosis as 7.2%. With this cutoff, the positive likelihood ratio was over 1.0 at age 55 and above but accuracy was low. In conclusion, FRAX without femoral neck BMD reflects bone status, and may be useful to diagnose osteoporosis in Japanese women aged 55 and above, although the sensitivity was low for osteoporosis screening, especially in middle-aged women.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 202
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Hyponatremia and fractures: should hyponatremia be further studied as a potential biochemical risk factor to be included in FRAX algorithms?
    Ayus, J. C.
    Bellido, T.
    Negri, A. L.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (05) : 1543 - 1548
  • [2] FRAX®: Prediction of Major Osteoporotic Fractures in Women from the General Population: The OPUS Study
    Briot, Karine
    Paternotte, Simon
    Kolta, Sami
    Eastell, Richard
    Felsenberg, Dieter
    Reid, David M.
    Glueer, Claus-C.
    Roux, Christian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [3] Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women
    Chao, An-Shine
    Chen, Fang-Ping
    Lin, Yu-Ching
    Huang, Ting-Shuo
    Fan, Chih-Ming
    Yu, Yu-Wei
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 54 (06): : 722 - 725
  • [4] Possible FRAX-based intervention thresholds for a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women
    Cheung, E.
    Cheung, C. -L.
    Kung, A. W. C.
    Tan, K. C. B.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (03) : 1017 - 1023
  • [5] Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review
    Crandall, Carolyn J.
    [J]. CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2015, 13 (05) : 287 - 301
  • [6] Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women 50 to 64 Years Old: Comparison of US Preventive Services Task Force Strategy and Two Traditional Strategies in the Women's Health Initiative
    Crandall, Carolyn J.
    Larson, Joseph
    Gourlay, Margaret L.
    Donaldson, Meghan G.
    LaCroix, Andrea
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    Gass, Margery L.
    Robbins, John A.
    Watts, Nelson B.
    Ensrud, Kristine E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2014, 29 (07) : 1661 - 1666
  • [7] Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX™)
    Fujiwara, S.
    Nakamura, T.
    Orimo, H.
    Hosoi, T.
    Gorai, I.
    Oden, A.
    Johansson, H.
    Kanis, J. A.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (04) : 429 - 435
  • [8] Hioki Atsushi, 2002, J Epidemiol, V12, P136
  • [9] Jeremiah MP, 2015, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V92, P261
  • [10] Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX
    Kalvesten, Johan
    Lui, Li-Yung
    Brismar, Torkel
    Cummings, Steven
    [J]. BONE, 2016, 86 : 30 - 35