Effect of 8-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Dyspnea and Functional Capacity of Patients on Waiting List for Lung Transplantation

被引:14
作者
Kilic, Lutfiye [1 ]
Pehlivan, Esra [2 ]
Balci, Arif [1 ]
Bakan, Nur Dilek [3 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Yedikule Chest Dis & Chest Surg Training & Res Ho, Dept Pulm Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Fac Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Sisli Mem Private Hosp, Dept Chest Dis, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
TURKISH THORACIC JOURNAL | 2020年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
Dyspnea; lung transplantation; muscle weakness; rehabilitation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; CANDIDATES; PREDICTORS; STATEMENT; SELECTION; DISEASE; TWICE;
D O I
10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.18202
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of comprehensive, 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme consisting of 60-min sessions twice a week under supervision on dyspnea and exercise capacity of patients who were lung transplantation (LTx) candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2012 and December 2014, medical data of 23 patients on the waiting list for LTx who were referred to our PR unit and completed 16-session outpatient under direct supervision were retrospectively analyzed. Data on exercise capacity as assessed by 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and the rate of perceived dyspnea as assessed by the Borg scale and Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale were recorded. RESULTS: Of 23 patients 57% were males; the mean age was 35 +/- 10 (range: 16-48) years. Four patients were operated early, as an appropriate donor was available. Diagnosis was as follows: bronchiectasis (n=10, 44%), silicosis (n=7, 30%), sarcoidosis (n=2, 9%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n=1, 4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1, 4%), and others (n=2, 9%). At the end of the program, there was a significant improvement (median: 60 m) in 6MWT scores (360 [70-254] m vs. 300 [139-489] m; p=0.018). In addition, a clinical improvement was observed in Borg (p=0.000) and MRC scores (p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that 8-week outpatient PR programme consisting of training twice a week is effective to decrease perceived dyspnea and to improve exercise capacity in patients who are on the waiting list for LTx.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Descriptors of dyspnea in obstructive lung diseases [J].
Antoniu, Sabina A. .
MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 5 (03) :216-219
[2]  
Aris R, 1998, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V158, P335
[3]   Systematic Review of Supervised Exercise Programs After Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Individuals With COPD [J].
Beauchamp, Marla K. ;
Evans, Rachael ;
Janaudis-Ferreira, Tania ;
Goldstein, Roger S. ;
Brooks, Dina .
CHEST, 2013, 144 (04) :1124-1133
[4]  
Brooks D, 2003, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V167, P1287, DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.167.9.950
[5]  
Büyükkale S, 2014, EUR RESPIR J, V44
[6]   Lung transplantation in Turkey: lessons from surgeons and pulmonologists [J].
Dabak, Gul ;
Dalar, Levent ;
Tasci, Erdal ;
Clark, Stephen .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 46 (05) :1434-1442
[7]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS AND THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC BRONCHITIS IN A WORKING POPULATION [J].
FLETCHER, CM ;
ELMES, PC ;
FAIRBAIRN, AS ;
WOOD, CH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1959, 2 (AUG29) :257-258
[8]   Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on quality of life and functional capacity in patients on waiting lists for lung transplantation [J].
Florian, Juliessa ;
Rubin, Adalberto ;
Mattiello, Rita ;
da Fontoura, Fabricio Farias ;
Peixoto Camargo, Jose de Jesus ;
Zimermann Teixeira, Paulo Jose .
JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, 2013, 39 (03) :349-356
[9]   PULMONARY REHABILITATION IN LUNG-DISEASE OTHER THAN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE [J].
FOSTER, S ;
THOMAS, HM .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1990, 141 (03) :601-604
[10]   Interval versus continuous training in lung transplant candidates: A randomized trial [J].
Gloeckl, Rainer ;
Halle, Martin ;
Kenn, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (09) :934-941