Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation in patients with Lisfranc fracture instability (The BFF Study) study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

被引:4
作者
van den Boom, N. A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Stollenwerck, G. A. N. L. [3 ]
Evers, S. M. A. A. [4 ]
Poeze, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Nutrim Sch Nutr Toxicol & Metab, Univ Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Alrijne Hosp, Dept Surg Trauma Surg, Simon Smitweg 1, NL-2353 GA Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Da Costakade 45, NL-3521 VS Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Traumatic Lisfranc fracture dislocation; ORIF; PA; Quality of life; Cost effectiveness; INJURIES; OUTCOMES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-021-01320-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Lisfranc injury is a complex injury of the midfoot. It can result in persistent pain and functional impairment if treated inappropriately. In Lisfranc fracture dislocation, treatment options are primary arthrodesis of the midfoot joints or open reduction and internal fixation. The purpose of the proposed study is to define the optimal treatment for the Lisfranc fracture dislocation, either primary arthrodesis or open reduction and internal fixation, in regard to quality of life, complications, functional outcomes, and cost effectiveness. Methods Study design: A prospective multicenter RCT. Study population: All patients of 18 years and older with an acute (< 6 weeks) traumatic fracture dislocation in the Lisfranc midfoot joints, displaced on static radiographic evaluation or unstable with dynamic evaluation, weight bearing radiographs or fluoroscopic stress testing under anesthesia, and eligible for either one of the surgical procedures. In total, this study will include n = 112 patients with Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Interventions: Patients with Lisfranc fracture dislocation will be randomly allocated to treatment in "The Better to Fix or Fuse Study" (The BFF Study) with either PA or ORIF. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome parameter: the quality of life. Secondary outcomes: complications, functional outcomes, secondary surgical interventions and cost effectiveness. Nature and extent of the burden: PA is expected to have a better outcome, however both treatments are accepted for this injury with a similar low risk of complications. Follow up is standardized and therefore this study will not add extra burden to the patient. Discussion This study protocol provides a comprehensive overview of the aims and methods of the attached clinical study. Limitations of this study are the absence of patient blinding since it is impossible in surgical intervention, and the outcome measure (AOFAS) that has limited validity not for these injuries. This study will be the first with enough power to define optimal treatment for Lisfranc fracture dislocations. This is necessary since current literature is unclear on this topic. Trial registration Current controlled Trial: NCT04519242 with registration date: 08/13/2020. Retrospectively registered; Protocol date and version: Version 4 05/06/2020
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Primary Arthrodesis Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Primarily Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries [J].
Albright, Rachel H. ;
Haller, Sarah ;
Klein, Erin ;
Baker, Jeffrey R. ;
Weil, Lowell, Jr. ;
Weil, Lowell S., Sr. ;
Fleischer, Adam E. .
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 57 (02) :325-331
[2]   Cost comparison and complication rate of Lisfranc injuries treated with open reduction internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis [J].
Barnds, Brandon ;
Tucker, William ;
Morris, Brandon ;
Tarakemeh, Armin ;
Schroeppel, John Paul ;
Mullen, Scott ;
Vopat, Bryan G. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (12) :2318-2321
[3]   Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries in a Young Athletic Population [J].
Cochran, Grant ;
Renninger, Christopher ;
Tompane, Trevor ;
Bellamy, Joseph ;
Kuhn, Kevin .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (09) :957-963
[4]   Subtle Lisfranc Subluxation: Results of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment [J].
Crates, John M. ;
Barber, F. Alan ;
Sanders, Eric J. .
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2015, 54 (03) :350-355
[5]   Clinical Outcomes and Development of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis 2 to 24 Years After Surgical Treatment of Tarsometatarsal Joint Complex Injuries [J].
Dubois-Ferriere, Victor ;
Lubbeke, Anne ;
Chowdhary, Ashwin ;
Stern, Richard ;
Dominguez, Dennis ;
Assal, Mathieu .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (09) :713-720
[6]   The surgical outcome of Lisfranc injuries accompanied by multiple metatarsal fractures: A multicenter retrospective study [J].
Fan, Meng-Qiang ;
Li, Xu-Song ;
Jiang, Xian-Jun ;
Shen, Jian-Jian ;
Tong, Pei-Jian ;
Huang, Jie-Feng .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (02) :571-578
[7]  
Hakkaartvan Roijen L., 2016, Kostenhandleiding: Methodologie van kostenonderzoek en referentieprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg
[8]   Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries in an Active Duty Military Population [J].
Hawkinson, Michael P. ;
Tennent, David J. ;
Belisle, Jeffrey ;
Osborn, Patrick .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (10) :1115-1119
[9]   Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Primary Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries: A Prospective Randomized Study [J].
Henning, Jeffrey A. ;
Jones, Clifford B. ;
Sietsema, Debra L. ;
Bohay, Donald R. ;
Anderson, John G. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (10) :913-922
[10]   DOWEL ARTHRODESIS FOR DEGENERATIVE ARTHRITIS OF THE TARSOMETATARSAL (LISFRANC) JOINTS [J].
JOHNSON, JE ;
JOHNSON, KA .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1986, 6 (05) :243-253