Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Local Infusion of Ropivacaine after Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy

被引:16
作者
Biglarnia, A. -R. [1 ]
Tufveson, G. [1 ]
Lorant, T. [1 ]
Lennmyr, F. [2 ]
Wadstrom, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Sect Transplantat Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Surg Sci, Sect Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Continuous infusion of local anesthetics; convalescence; donor safety; HARS; pain relief; ropivacaine; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; ACUTE PAIN; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE; COMPLICATIONS; MORPHINE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; KETOBEMIDONE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03358.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Morphine-based analgesia is effective but can compromise donor safety. We investigated whether continuous infusion of local anesthetics (CILA) can provide sufficient pain control and reduce morbidity related to opiate analgesics after hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic (HARS) live donor nephrectomy. Forty consecutive live kidney donors underwent HARS and were treated with the ON-Q system providing CILA with 0.5% ropivacaine through two SilvaGard (R) catheters placed in the retroperitoneal cavity and the rectus sheath, respectively. The case control group consisted of 40 donors matched with regard to sex, age, BMI and surgical technique. All donors were maintained on standardized multimodal analgesia combining nurse-controlled oxycodone treatment and acetaminophen. CILA donors had lower median cumulative consumption of morphine equivalents (CCME) (7 mg [0-56] vs. 42 mg [15-127]; p < 0.0000001), lower incidence of nausea (18 [45%] vs. 35 [87.5%] donors; p < 0.001), shorter time in postoperative care unit (160 vs. 242.5 min; p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (4 [4-7] vs. 6 [4-11] days; p < 0.001). In 32.5% of CILA donors the CCME was 0 mg (0% in matched control group, p < 0.001). CILA with 0.5% ropivacaine provides effective postoperative pain relief, reduces the need for opioid treatment and promotes postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DRUGS
[2]  
Ashburn MA, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V100, P1573
[3]   How painful is donor nephrectomy?: Retrospective analysis of early pain and pain management in open versus laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy [J].
Bachmann, Alexander ;
Wolff, Thomas ;
Giannini, Olivier ;
Dickenman, Michael ;
Ruszat, Robin ;
Guerke, Lorenz ;
Kaufmann, Mark ;
Gasser, Thomas C. ;
Steiger, Juerg ;
Stief, Christian G. ;
Sulser, Tullio .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (12) :1735-1738
[4]  
Berry P H, 2000, Pain Manag Nurs, V1, P3, DOI 10.1053/jpmn.2000.5833
[5]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the conventional open approach [J].
Brown, SL ;
Biehl, TR ;
Rawlins, MC ;
Hefty, TR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :766-769
[6]   Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The first 175 cases [J].
Chan, DY ;
Fabrizio, MD ;
Ratner, LE ;
Kavoussi, LR .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (04) :778-778
[7]   The First Decade of a Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Program: Effect of Surgeon and Institution Experience with 512 Cases from 1996 to 2006 [J].
Chin, Edward H. ;
Hazzan, David ;
Edye, Michael ;
Wisnivesky, Juan P. ;
Herron, Daniel M. ;
Ames, Scott A. ;
Palese, Michael ;
Pomp, Alfons ;
Gagner, Michel ;
Bromberg, Jonathan S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) :106-113
[8]   THE OPIOID RECEPTOR-BINDING PROFILES OF KETOBEMIDONE AND MORPHINE [J].
CHRISTENSEN, CB .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 73 (06) :344-345
[9]   Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure [J].
Deng, DY ;
Meng, MV ;
Nguyen, HT ;
Bellman, GC ;
Stoller, ML .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (03) :415-419
[10]  
Diethelm AG, 1997, ANN SURG, V226, P489