A Comparative Study of Maternal-Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Induction of Labor and Spontaneous Onset of Labor in a Rural Tertiary Care Center

被引:1
作者
Sangwan, Vijayata [1 ]
Khandelwal, Shivani [1 ]
Upadhaya, Manisha [1 ]
Lakra, Pinkey [1 ]
Sangwan, Mukeshkumar [2 ]
Siwach, Sunita [1 ]
Mahendru, Rajiv [1 ]
机构
[1] BPS Govt Med Coll Women, Dept Obst & Gynae, Khanpur Kalan Sonepat, Haryana, India
[2] BPS Govt Med Coll Women, Dept Gen Surg, Khanpur Kalan Sonepat, Haryana, India
关键词
induction of labor; failed induction; prostaglandins;
D O I
10.1891/IJC-2021-0004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The present prospective observational study was conducted to study the incidence, indications, and outcomes of induction of labor in a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study group of this prospective cross-sectional study was constituted by all term pregnant women underwent trial of labor. The whole study group was further subdivided in two groups, group 1: Was having all pregnant women with spontaneous onset of labor pains and group 2 was containing all pregnant women underwent induction of labor. For induction only prostaglandins (PGE(1) 25 microgram tablet and PGE2 gel) were used. The measure of outcome included assessment of the incidence of induction in term pregnant women, major indications of induction of labor, duration of labor, mode of delivery, intrapartum and postpartum maternal-fetal complications and duration of hospital stay. The study group included 3264 pregnant women and was differentiated into group 1 with 2,588 pregnant women and group 2 with 676 pregnant women. RESULTS: The incidence of induction was 20.71%. Major indications of induction were a fetus who was postdates, premature rupture of membranes, and preeclampsia. The average duration of the induction to delivery interval was 19.13 +/- 15.14 hours (hrs.) and admission to delivery interval in the spontaneous labor group was 8.79 +/- 07.18 hrs. The incidence of cesarean delivery was 19.52% in the induction group (gp2). Failed induction was the most common indication of lower segment cesarean section (CS). The incidence of CS was 15.99% in spontaneous group (gp1) and fetal distress was most common indication in this group. With this study, we found the importance of rest after the induction process was completed. During this watchful rest period, 51 pregnant women delivered vaginally. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and neonatal death rate was more in group 1. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the incidence and indications of induction of labor among term pregnant women were similar to developed countries in spite of active physical life. The complication rate, operative intervention and hospital stay was more with induction group.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Abisowo O., 2017, Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, V34, P21, DOI DOI 10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_59_16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WHO recommendations for induction of labour
[3]   Definition of Failed Induction of Labor and Its Predictive Factors: Two Unsolved Issues of an Everyday Clinical Situation [J].
Banos, Nuria ;
Migliorelli, Federico ;
Posadas, Eduardo ;
Ferreri, Janisse ;
Palacio, Montse .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2015, 38 (03) :161-169
[4]  
Chawla S., 2017, J MAR MED SOC, V19, P96
[5]   A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour [J].
Coates, Dominiek ;
Makris, Angela ;
Catling, Christine ;
Henry, Amanda ;
Scarf, Vanessa ;
Watts, Nicole ;
Fox, Deborah ;
Thirukumar, Purshaiyna ;
Wong, Vincent ;
Russell, Hamish ;
Homer, Caroline .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01)
[6]   The risk factors for failure of labor induction: A cohort study [J].
Giugliano E. ;
Cagnazzo E. ;
Milillo V. ;
Moscarini M. ;
Vesce F. ;
Caserta D. ;
Marci R. .
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2014, 64 (2) :111-115
[7]  
Federation of Obstetric & Gynaecological Societies of India, 2018, FOGSI REC IND LAB
[8]  
Kaur P., 2013, INDIAN J CLIN PRACT, V24, P651
[9]   Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting [J].
Lawani, Osaheni Lucky ;
Onyebuchi, Azubuike Kanario ;
Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony ;
Okafo, Chikezie Nwachukwu ;
Ajah, Leonard Ogbonna .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[10]   Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term (Review) [J].
Middleton, Philippa ;
Shepherd, Emily ;
Crowther, Caroline A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05)