Assessing embodied energy of building structural elements

被引:69
|
作者
Vukotic, L. [1 ]
Fenner, R. A. [2 ]
Symons, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arup, London, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Ctr Sustainable Dev, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[3] Ramboll UK, London, England
关键词
structural frameworks; energy; LIFE-CYCLE ENERGY;
D O I
10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.147
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although operational energy is currently the focal point of sustainability in building regulations, embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions will become more significant as operational energy consumption is reduced. In the near future, embodied energy could account for a significant proportion of a building's carbon footprint over its lifetime, bearing in mind that the construction of energy-efficient buildings is carbon and energy intensive. Unlike operational energy, embodied energy savings have an immediate significant effect on carbon footprint and are independent of human behaviour. However, there is a lack of consensus within the construction industry on how to assess embodied energy and carbon dioxide and where to draw system boundaries, which has impeded advancement on the issue. This paper analyses the life-cycle embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of a building's structural elements, and examines which stages within a building's life are the most significant and offer the most opportunities for a reduction of embodied energy and carbon dioxide. The embodied energy and associated carbon dioxide at the product and construction, maintenance and end-of-life stages of a structure are examined, as well as the potential for energy recovery and carbon dioxide offsetting. A simple single-storey structure is used as a case study to perform comparative analyses between two structural design alternatives: glue-laminated timber panels and steel frame with infill concrete blockwork.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Embodied energy and cost of building materials: correlation analysis
    Dixit, Manish K.
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2017, 45 (05): : 508 - 523
  • [22] Embodied Energy Comparison of Prefabricated and Conventional Building Construction
    Abey S.T.
    Anand K.B.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2019, 100 (04) : 777 - 790
  • [23] Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies
    Reddy, BVV
    Jagadish, KS
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2003, 35 (02) : 129 - 137
  • [24] Examining the Impact of House Size on Building Embodied Energy
    Rauf, Abdul
    Attoye, Daniel Euroizing
    Khalfan, Malik Mansoor Ali
    Shafiq, Muhammad Tariq
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [25] Comparing the embodied energy of structural systems in buildings
    Griffin, C. T.
    Reed, B.
    Hsu, S.
    STRUCTURES AND ARCHITECTURE, 2010, : 1367 - 1373
  • [26] Low embodied energy sustainable building materials and technologies
    Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, India
    不详
    Key Eng Mat, (13-20):
  • [27] Material Nature versus Structural Nurture: The Embodied Carbon of Fundamental Structural Elements
    Purnell, P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (01) : 454 - 461
  • [28] An analysis of comparative studies on embodied carbon and embodied energy assessment of tall building structures
    Gedik, Beste Fakioglu
    Ay, Bekir Ozer
    Cakmakli, Aysem Berrin
    MEGARON, 2023, 18 (03): : 387 - 400
  • [29] Factoring in embodied GHG emissions when assessing the environmental performance of building
    Chen, Yuan
    Ng, S. Thomas
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 27 : 244 - 252
  • [30] Embodied energy versus operational energy in a nearly zero energy building case study
    Giordano, Roberto
    Serra, Valentina
    Demaria, Enrico
    Duzel, Angela
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, SEB-16, 2017, 111 : 377 - 386