Configurations for corporate venture innovation: Investigating the role of the dominant coalition

被引:53
作者
Waldkirch, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Kammerlander, Nadine [3 ]
Wiedeler, Conrad [3 ]
机构
[1] EBS Univ Wirtschaft & Recht, Entrepreneurship & Family Firm Inst EFFI, Rheingaustr 1, D-65375 Oestrich Winkel, Germany
[2] Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Ctr Family Entrepreneurship & Ownership CeFEO, Gjuterigatan 5, S-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Inst Family Business & Mittelstand, Burgpl 2, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
关键词
Dominant coalition; Innovation; Corporate venturing; Venture autonomy; Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; FAMILY FIRMS; MANAGEMENT; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; CREATION; BUSINESS; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106137
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organizations often create new businesses, so-called corporate ventures (CVs), with the purpose of fostering innovation. However, not all venture initiatives turn out to be innovative. Prior research in particular refers to the ambivalent role of the parent firm's dominant coalition in fostering or hindering innovation in CVs. Using a configurational (fsQCA) approach, we investigate the interplay of five key conditions at the parent firm, the parent firm-venture intersection, and venture levels that potentially drive CV innovation. Building on 62 interviews from 43 corporate ventures, we identify four equifinal configurations and outline four roles that the dominant coalition plays in creating CV innovation. This study contributes to the understanding of which CV configurations drive innovation, extends the role of the dominant coalition in corporate venturing, and shows how dominant coalition involvement can replace autonomy as a driver of innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 108 条
[91]   THE PARADOX OF STRETCH GOALS: ORGANIZATIONS IN PURSUIT OF THE SEEMINGLY IMPOSSIBLE [J].
Sitkin, Sim B. ;
See, Kelly E. ;
Miller, C. Chet ;
Lawless, Michael W. ;
Carton, Andrew M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 36 (03) :544-566
[92]   Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results [J].
Skaaning, Svend-Erik .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2011, 40 (02) :391-408
[93]   Alert and Awake: Role of alertness and attention on rate of new product introductions [J].
Srivastava, Smita ;
Sahaym, Arvin ;
Allison, Thomas H. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2021, 36 (04)
[94]   THE CONCEPT OF COALITION IN ORGANIZATION THEORY AND RESEARCH [J].
STEVENSON, WB ;
PEARCE, JL ;
PORTER, LW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1985, 10 (02) :256-268
[95]   Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms [J].
Tanriverdi, H ;
Venkatraman, N .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (02) :97-119
[96]   A dynamic perspective of internal fit in corporate venturing [J].
Thornhill, S ;
Amit, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2001, 16 (01) :25-50
[97]  
Tidd J., 1999, Creativity and Innovation Management, V8, P122, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8691.00126
[98]   Addressing the 'Qualitative' in fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template [J].
Toth, Zsofia ;
Henneberg, Stephan C. ;
Naude, Peter .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 63 :192-204
[99]   Technology In-Sourcing and the Creation of Pioneering Technologies [J].
van de Vrande, Vareska ;
Vanhaverbeke, Wim ;
Duysters, Geert .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 28 (06) :974-987
[100]   SUCCESSFUL AND FAILING INTERNAL CORPORATE VENTURES - EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
VONHIPPEL, E .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1977, 6 (03) :163-174