Exchanging Bandwidth With Aperture Size in Wireless Indoor Localization-Or Why 5G/6G Systems With Antenna Arrays Can Outperform UWB Solutions

被引:21
作者
Sippel, Erik [1 ]
Geiss, Johanna [1 ]
Brueckner, Stefan [1 ]
Groeschel, Patrick [1 ]
Hehn, Markus [1 ]
Vossiek, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg, Inst Microwaves & Photon, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
来源
IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 2卷
关键词
Location awareness; Receivers; Sensitivity; Antenna arrays; Position measurement; Bandwidth; Wireless communication; Radar; indoor localization; antenna array; ultra wide band; 5G; massive MIMO; Kalman filter; MASSIVE MIMO; RADAR INTERFEROMETRY; MULTIPATH; NETWORKS; LIMITS; TIME;
D O I
10.1109/OJVT.2021.3078551
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The localization of wireless devices in indoor scenarios presents a major challenge because of multipath propagation. Hence, the majority of the research community has focused on increasing the available bandwidth of localization systems, leading to the emergence of the ultra wide band (UWB) radar. However, the hardware implementation of UWB transceivers is challenging itself and, hence, their utilization in commercial low-cost wireless devices is not to be expected in the near future. Hence, instead of evaluating frequency dependent phases via UWB, the measurement of spatially distributed phases represents a valuable alternative. Therefore, this article presents a comparison of phase-difference-of-arrival (PDOA) and time-of-arrival (TOA) systems. For this purpose, we compare the measurement sensitivity, the effects of multipath propagation, and the hardware complexity. Based on the results, the applicability of typical position estimators is discussed. Thereby, we argue that PDOA-based localization with large receiver arrays appears to be the better choice to localize wireless devices, because it enables highly accurate positioning using narrow band signals without elaborated transmitter-receiver synchronization. To validate this, indoor localization measurements are presented and compared with UWB results in extant literature.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 217
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   A Survey on the Impact of Multipath on Wideband Time-of-Arrival-Based Localization [J].
Aditya, Sundar ;
Molisch, Andreas F. ;
Behairy, Hatim Mohammed .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2018, 106 (07) :1183-1203
[2]   6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems [J].
Akyildiz, Ian F. ;
Kak, Ahan ;
Nie, Shuai .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :133995-134030
[3]   Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances [J].
Alarifi, Abdulrahman ;
Al-Salman, AbdulMalik ;
Alsaleh, Mansour ;
Alnafessah, Ahmad ;
Al-Hadhrami, Suheer ;
Al-Ammar, Mai A. ;
Al-Khalifa, Hend S. .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (05)
[4]  
Amundson I, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5970, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-11917-0_1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P C PROC ICECOM 20 I
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ARXIV150306854
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INDOOR POSITIONING T
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ARXIV14036697
[9]  
Ash JN, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, P61, DOI 10.1109/IPSN.2007.4379665
[10]   Smartphone Sensor Based Indoor Positioning: Current Status, Opportunities, and Future Challenges [J].
Ashraf, Imran ;
Hur, Soojung ;
Park, Yongwan .
ELECTRONICS, 2020, 9 (06)