An Explanation of Yield Differences in Three Potato Cultivars

被引:21
作者
Oliveira, J. S. [1 ]
Brown, H. E. [2 ]
Gash, A. [1 ]
Moot, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agr & Life Sci, POB 85084, Canterbury 7647, New Zealand
[2] New Zealand Inst Plant & Food Res Ltd, Private Bag 4604, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
TUBER-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; DRY-MATTER ALLOCATION; RADIATION INTERCEPTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; LEAF NITROGEN; GROWTH; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PRODUCTIVITY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2015.0486
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Under ideal growing conditions, yield is the product of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (PARi) and its conversion efficiency to dry matter (radiation use efficiency, RUE). For potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) the ability of the leaf to convert the PARi into carbohydrates (source) and the storage capacity of the tubers (sink) affect the potential growth of individual tubers and therefore crop yield. This study describes these mechanisms for three commercial potato cultivars (Bondi, Fraser, and Russet Burbank) grown in non-limiting field conditions. At final harvest Bondi had the largest tuber yield and produced heavier but fewer tubers compared with Fraser and Russet Burbank. All crops had similar total accumulated radiation interception (R-cum), and yield differences were explained by the RUE which was highest for Bondi, lowest for Fraser, with Russet Burbank intermediate. Fraser had the lowest rate of canopy senescence, maintained the lowest specific leaf area (SLA) for most of the period of tuber bulking and maintained the highest dry matter (DM) allocated to leaves at the end of the tuber filling phase. Throughout the crop growing period Bondi had a larger tuber sink compared with Fraser and Russet Burbank. These results suggest that potato tuber production was limited by the sink strength and RUE in the lower yield varieties. The larger sink in Bondi, caused by shorter stolons, enabled higher rates of tuber filling which produced the largest tubers in the middle node positions and the highest average tuber weight per plant among these cultivars.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1446
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abd El-Hak M.Z., 1969, DEEL, V69, P1
[2]   AN ANALYSIS OF GROWTH OF THE POTATO CROP [J].
ALLEN, EJ ;
SCOTT, RK .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1980, 94 (JUN) :583-606
[3]   THE EFFECT OF GRAIN NUMBER PER EAR (SINK SIZE) ON SOURCE ACTIVITY AND ITS WATER-RELATIONS IN WHEAT [J].
BLUM, A ;
MAYER, J ;
GOLAN, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1988, 39 (198) :106-114
[4]  
Brown H. E., 2004, THESIS
[5]   The Canon of Potato Science: 37. Stolonization, Tuber Induction and Tuberization [J].
P. H. Brown .
Potato Research, 2007, 50 (3-4) :363-365
[6]   On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index [J].
Carlson, TN ;
Ripley, DA .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 62 (03) :241-252
[7]   TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN CV SEBAGO AND QUANTITATIVE EFFECTS OF RHIZOCTONIA-SOLANI ON YIELD [J].
COTHER, EJ ;
CULLIS, BR .
POTATO RESEARCH, 1985, 28 (01) :1-14
[8]   SLOW-GROWTH PHENOTYPE OF TRANSGENIC TOMATO EXPRESSING APOPLASTIC INVERTASE [J].
DICKINSON, CD ;
ALTABELLA, T ;
CHRISPEELS, MJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 95 (02) :420-425
[9]   SOURCE SINK RELATIONSHIPS DURING TUBER GROWTH [J].
DWELLE, RB .
AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1990, 67 (12) :829-833
[10]  
Ellisseche D, 1995, CURR ISS PROD ECOL, V3, P341