Stress on implant-supported fixed prostheses with different numbers of abutments after the application of acrylic resin

被引:0
作者
Palmeiro, Marina Rechden Lobato [1 ]
de Barcellos, Leonardo Hoffmann [2 ]
Naconecy, Marcos
Geremia, Tomas [1 ]
Cervieri, Andre [3 ]
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Prosthodont, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Postgrad Program Dent, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Luterana Brasil, Dept Engn, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
IN-VIVO; BRANEMARK IMPLANTS; FRAMEWORK ALLOY; BIOMECHANICS; MISFIT; FORCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Clinical procedures and laboratory processing techniques inevitably induce stress in the implant/abutment/prosthesis system and may have negative effects when different numbers of implants are used. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the tension on the abutments of implant-supported fixed prostheses and to determine the effect of the application of an esthetic veneer (acrylic resin) and the number of abutments (5 or 4). Material and methods. Four palladium-silver alloy cast bars were fabricated to simulate implant-supported fixed complete prostheses. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments to measure the tension before and after the application of the esthetic veneer. The values of tension were measured in models with 5 or 4 abutments. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA. Results. No statistically significant differences were found for the main factors (esthetic veneer, P=.22; number of abutments, P=.14) despite the large effect size. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the tension in the abutments of an implant-supported fixed prosthesis is not affected by the application of acrylic resin veneering or by reducing the number of abutments.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Malo P., 2003, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, V5, P2, DOI [10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1708-8208.2003.TB00010.X]
  • [22] FORCE AND MOMENT DISTRIBUTIONS AMONG OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANTS
    MORGAN, MJ
    JAMES, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (09) : 1103 - 1109
  • [23] Murphy WM, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P133
  • [24] Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
    Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
    Geremia, Tomas
    Cervieri, Andre
    Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim
    Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 18 (02) : 178 - 185
  • [25] Naconecy MM, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P192
  • [26] MEASUREMENT OF DISTORTION - CONCLUDING REMARKS
    NICHOLLS, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1980, 43 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [27] Sahin S, 2001, Implant Dent, V10, P85
  • [28] BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN OSSEOINTEGRATED PROSTHESES
    SKALAK, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (06) : 843 - 848
  • [29] Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis
    Suedam, Valdey
    Capello Souza, Edson Antonio
    Moura, Marcio Silva
    Jacques, Leticia Borges
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [30] Tan K B, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P346