Stress on implant-supported fixed prostheses with different numbers of abutments after the application of acrylic resin

被引:0
作者
Palmeiro, Marina Rechden Lobato [1 ]
de Barcellos, Leonardo Hoffmann [2 ]
Naconecy, Marcos
Geremia, Tomas [1 ]
Cervieri, Andre [3 ]
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Prosthodont, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Postgrad Program Dent, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Luterana Brasil, Dept Engn, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
IN-VIVO; BRANEMARK IMPLANTS; FRAMEWORK ALLOY; BIOMECHANICS; MISFIT; FORCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Clinical procedures and laboratory processing techniques inevitably induce stress in the implant/abutment/prosthesis system and may have negative effects when different numbers of implants are used. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the tension on the abutments of implant-supported fixed prostheses and to determine the effect of the application of an esthetic veneer (acrylic resin) and the number of abutments (5 or 4). Material and methods. Four palladium-silver alloy cast bars were fabricated to simulate implant-supported fixed complete prostheses. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments to measure the tension before and after the application of the esthetic veneer. The values of tension were measured in models with 5 or 4 abutments. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA. Results. No statistically significant differences were found for the main factors (esthetic veneer, P=.22; number of abutments, P=.14) despite the large effect size. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the tension in the abutments of an implant-supported fixed prosthesis is not affected by the application of acrylic resin veneering or by reducing the number of abutments.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [11] Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses:: an in vivo study
    Duyck, J
    Van Oosterwyck, H
    Vander Sloten, J
    De Cooman, M
    Puers, R
    Naert, I
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (05) : 465 - 475
  • [12] Eser A, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P439
  • [13] Geremia T, 2009, REV ODONTO CIENC BRA, V24, P145
  • [14] GRACIS S E, 1991, International Journal of Prosthodontics, V4, P282
  • [15] Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses
    Jacques, Leticia Borges
    Moura, Marcio Silva
    Suedam, Valdey
    Capello Souza, Edson Antonio
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (07) : 737 - 741
  • [16] JEMT T, 1991, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V6, P270
  • [17] Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures - A pilot study in rabbits
    Jemt, T
    Lekholm, U
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (04) : 272 - 280
  • [18] Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit
    Kan, JYK
    Rungcharassaeng, K
    Bohsali, K
    Goodacre, CJ
    Lang, BR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [19] Karl M, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P689
  • [20] Early functional loading of conical Branemark implants in the edentulous mandible:: A 12-month follow-up clinical report
    Kronström, M
    Widbom, T
    Löfquist, LE
    Henningson, C
    Widbom, C
    Lundberg, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (04) : 335 - 340